I am under the impression the stock cooler is crap. I dont know why Intel didn't include that big one they were sending out for testing with the 2600K.
I am about a low 30~ at Idle and tempts constantly rise to 80c until i just shut prime 95 down. This is at with everything running stock - no OC.
At first I went 4.0 ghz, ran prime95, and shut it off at 80c.
After that I went back to stock 3.4, ran prime and shut it off at 80c. I dont want to see how hot it can get.
I dont know how hot a chip will get when running prime 95 for an hour but since this is considered "FULL LOAD" would that mean the stock cooler from intel is not even sufficient to run a 2600K at full load? I haven't built a PC in a long time but i am pretty sure its seated correctly and there isnt TOO much extra (if extra at all) thermal compound on the CPU.......I used the "2 rice size portions rubbed on the chip with your finger covered in plastic" method.
Can anyone recommend a better heatsink at the Hyper 212 pricepoint.
And if I were to step it up....I dont care too much about costs would i be fine getting any of the heatsinks on this top 10 list?
http://www.frostytech.com/top5heatsinks.cfm
not sure how old the list is or if it is reliable.
TY All. I planned to run at 4.0 but 4.5 with a stable and safe temp would be nice.