- Mar 26, 2005
- 4,094
- 123
- 106
So they were throwing out a bunch of old PCs at my job... I got one for my parents, and a few others I salvaged the CPUs from and some RAM as spares in case the PC fails. I really wanted to take more, but I got no space, so whatever...
I got this crazy idea to buy a good overclocking LGA 1156 board and push these babies to the limit as far as air cooling will allow. I got 4 of them to kill.
Right from the start this does seem to be a pretty bad idea. First of all, I got a nice i5-6600k rig running at 4.5GHz so this whole ordeal, is not because I need this, but just because I can. Just for fun. But at the same time, I don't want to bother if the end performance will be complete crap, and I'll have to waste more money on good overclocking hardware that it would cost to buy something newer.
I cant really find any good online articles about performance of an overclocked i5-650. I looked at a website called cpu-boss, and according to it an i3-2100 will beat an i5-650 in overall performance. That's pretty depressing, since it would probably cost less to build an i3-2100 system today, from scratch, using old parts bought right here on AT from random people...
What do you think? Am I right? Am I wrong? Would a i5-650 be faster than say... i5-2500(non-k) when overclocked to like 4.2GHz? Am I just wasting my time with these stupid ideas?
PS: By the way, I only care about gaming performance of all mentioned CPUs, nothing else. And yes, I know they wouldn't run any of the newest games well.
I got this crazy idea to buy a good overclocking LGA 1156 board and push these babies to the limit as far as air cooling will allow. I got 4 of them to kill.
Right from the start this does seem to be a pretty bad idea. First of all, I got a nice i5-6600k rig running at 4.5GHz so this whole ordeal, is not because I need this, but just because I can. Just for fun. But at the same time, I don't want to bother if the end performance will be complete crap, and I'll have to waste more money on good overclocking hardware that it would cost to buy something newer.
I cant really find any good online articles about performance of an overclocked i5-650. I looked at a website called cpu-boss, and according to it an i3-2100 will beat an i5-650 in overall performance. That's pretty depressing, since it would probably cost less to build an i3-2100 system today, from scratch, using old parts bought right here on AT from random people...
What do you think? Am I right? Am I wrong? Would a i5-650 be faster than say... i5-2500(non-k) when overclocked to like 4.2GHz? Am I just wasting my time with these stupid ideas?
PS: By the way, I only care about gaming performance of all mentioned CPUs, nothing else. And yes, I know they wouldn't run any of the newest games well.
Last edited: