I wish I was as eloquent as Richard Dawkins

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Richard Dawkins had an excellent documentary on television in the UK recently called "The Root of Evil?" Not sure if it is available as a DVD, but it is available via the P2P networks. There is a fascinating segment where Dawkins has a run-in with Teddy Haggard - prior to Haggard's downfall after revelations of his homosexual sexcapades. Haggard accuses Dawkins of arrogance. As Dawkins is leaving (after the interview) Haggard and security guards roar up in a SUV and demand that Dawkins get off the property and threatening to call police.

So what? Haggard is just as much a bigoted sh!thead as Dawkins is.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: ElFenix
nice dodge of the question.
He hit the question head on. You want me to make it a little clearer so you can understand it? What if here's wrong? The same question can be asked of you? What if you are wrong (you being religious)? What happens if Big Foot was the REAL God? You'd be banished to the dark scary eternal wilderness. And now in light of this conversation, I'm sure you wished you'd dedicated your life to Big Foot now. Don't you?

No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages. If "Big Foot" were the name you gave to concept of the universal almighty God, then "Big Foot" would be God. His argument is like if someone said that snow and nieve (the Spanish word for snow) were not the same thing.

He answered it correctly. Zeus is God, but the Greeks have different "punishments" and rewards for believing. What the audience member was getting at was, if Atheism is wrong, then the punshment is hell. So she is basically saying, if Atheism is wrong then by default Christianity is right and the punishment for not believing is hell. She doesn't take into consideration if Atheism is wrong AND Christianity is wrong, BOTH beliefs will be punished. So there is really no point to the question.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: ElFenix
nice dodge of the question.
He hit the question head on. You want me to make it a little clearer so you can understand it? What if here's wrong? The same question can be asked of you? What if you are wrong (you being religious)? What happens if Big Foot was the REAL God? You'd be banished to the dark scary eternal wilderness. And now in light of this conversation, I'm sure you wished you'd dedicated your life to Big Foot now. Don't you?

No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages. If "Big Foot" were the name you gave to concept of the universal almighty God, then "Big Foot" would be God. His argument is like if someone said that snow and nieve (the Spanish word for snow) were not the same thing.

He answered it correctly. Zeus is God, but the Greeks have different "punishments" and rewards for believing. What the audience member was getting at was, if Atheism is wrong, then the punshment is hell. So she is basically saying, if Atheism is wrong then by default Christianity is right and the punishment for not believing is hell. She doesn't take into consideration if Atheism is wrong AND Christianity is wrong, BOTH beliefs will be punished. So there is really no point to the question.

Perhaps that occurred before the video began, but I missed the part where the questioner specifically referred to Christianity, so I don't see where you're getting with that. There was still heaven and hell in ancient Greece (who were BTW the first converts to Christianity) and the rules were quite similar. Not that that matters, as you still miss the same point I told you about a hundred times before. I think it's the broken record of "Us vs. Them" thinking that traps you.
 

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: loic2003
yeah, every single religious person should read 'The God Delusion'. It's an eye opener for those with a religious/closed mind. Dawkins manages to convey eloquently what most atheists feel, and he backs up his ideas with decent references.

After reading his books, you can't help but feel pity for the religious folk, wasting their lives away in churches/mosques/synagogues.

You'd think that in these religious nut schools where they try to teach both evolution and noah's ark in biology lessons (yeah-because evolutions isn't the only theory, and they want the kids to have broader minds... sure!) that they should have at least a thumb through Dawkins' work in order to show them what the alternative to religion is, in order to further broaden their minds! I fear Dawkins' works will be seen as heresy or the work of the devil, however, and kids will be further mentally abused by the church and it's followers.

I'm not religious, but I think yours and Dawkins kind are just as closed-minded as the religious. Even more so when you consider than most religious people are not even really devout, while you appear to be quite fanatical.
Seriously, why do you care what other people believe? That type of thinking is the province of the religious.

I wouldn't care if they stuck to their own and did their own little silly thing to themselves, but when you have tards bombing clubs in Bali, or dïckheads saying god told them to invade iraq, then it's pretty serious stuff. Plus, it's quite sick to mentally abuse children from birth, and feel that the public should do something against this disgusting behaviour.

Nothing stirs more anger within me than religious people spreading their lies and crap stories.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Vic's assumption was that as long as you believed in any god "Zeus/Woden/Etc", whichever god ended up being at the end of the tunnel would be happy with you and reward you. But that is just that, another assumption, his own set of beliefs, no more right or wrong than any other. And infact, it flies against the texts of most religious works. (Such as how the bible says worship none other than me)
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: ElFenix
nice dodge of the question.
He hit the question head on. You want me to make it a little clearer so you can understand it? What if here's wrong? The same question can be asked of you? What if you are wrong (you being religious)? What happens if Big Foot was the REAL God? You'd be banished to the dark scary eternal wilderness. And now in light of this conversation, I'm sure you wished you'd dedicated your life to Big Foot now. Don't you?

asking the same question back is not answering the question.

Let me ask you then, how would YOU answer that question?
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
the other issue is the little matter of self-respect. No-one who truly respects themselves, imo, could worship the christian god (perhaps one of the most mean-sprited, narcissistic, murderous, contrary gods we have ever invented - it's all there in the bible, I suggest christians go read it some time - and not just select passages, read the entire thing in all it's barbaric, sociopathic glory).

assuming the christian god is a real god, I will take an eternity burning in hell over kissing god's ass.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: skace
Vic's assumption was that as long as you believed in any god "Zeus/Woden/Etc", whichever god ended up being at the end of the tunnel would be happy with you and reward you. But that is just that, another assumption, his own set of beliefs, no more right or wrong than any other. And infact, it flies against the texts of most religious works. (Such as how the bible says worship none other than me)

How you got that assumption, I have no idea, but you are completely wrong.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: skace
Vic's assumption was that as long as you believed in any god "Zeus/Woden/Etc", whichever god ended up being at the end of the tunnel would be happy with you and reward you. But that is just that, another assumption, his own set of beliefs, no more right or wrong than any other. And infact, it flies against the texts of most religious works. (Such as how the bible says worship none other than me)

indeed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: loic2003
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: loic2003
yeah, every single religious person should read 'The God Delusion'. It's an eye opener for those with a religious/closed mind. Dawkins manages to convey eloquently what most atheists feel, and he backs up his ideas with decent references.

After reading his books, you can't help but feel pity for the religious folk, wasting their lives away in churches/mosques/synagogues.

You'd think that in these religious nut schools where they try to teach both evolution and noah's ark in biology lessons (yeah-because evolutions isn't the only theory, and they want the kids to have broader minds... sure!) that they should have at least a thumb through Dawkins' work in order to show them what the alternative to religion is, in order to further broaden their minds! I fear Dawkins' works will be seen as heresy or the work of the devil, however, and kids will be further mentally abused by the church and it's followers.

I'm not religious, but I think yours and Dawkins kind are just as closed-minded as the religious. Even more so when you consider than most religious people are not even really devout, while you appear to be quite fanatical.
Seriously, why do you care what other people believe? That type of thinking is the province of the religious.

I wouldn't care if they stuck to their own and did their own little silly thing to themselves, but when you have tards bombing clubs in Bali, or dïckheads saying god told them to invade iraq, then it's pretty serious stuff. Plus, it's quite sick to mentally abuse children from birth, and feel that the public should do something against this disgusting behaviour.

Nothing stirs more anger within me than religious people spreading their lies and crap stories.

Which is why you're busy sticking to your own, right?

:roll:
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,503
136
Originally posted by: aidanjm
the other issue is the little matter of self-respect. NO-ONE who TRULY respects themselves could worship the christian god (perhaps one of the most mean-sprited, narcissistic, murderous, contrary gods we have ever invented - it's all there in the bible, I suggest christians go read it some time - and not just select passages, read the entire thing in all it's barbaric, sociopathic glory).

assuming the christian god is a real god, I will take an eternity burning in hell over kissing god's ass.

I've read the Bible and continue to read it. If you can point out a specific passage (any will do) that would be helpful. People can claim God to be those attributes only when they take text out of context. Anything can be made to seem evil if you just take what they say out of context.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: ElFenix
nice dodge of the question.
He hit the question head on. You want me to make it a little clearer so you can understand it? What if here's wrong? The same question can be asked of you? What if you are wrong (you being religious)? What happens if Big Foot was the REAL God? You'd be banished to the dark scary eternal wilderness. And now in light of this conversation, I'm sure you wished you'd dedicated your life to Big Foot now. Don't you?

No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages. If "Big Foot" were the name you gave to concept of the universal almighty God, then "Big Foot" would be God. His argument is like if someone said that snow and nieve (the Spanish word for snow) were not the same thing.

He answered it correctly. Zeus is God, but the Greeks have different "punishments" and rewards for believing. What the audience member was getting at was, if Atheism is wrong, then the punshment is hell. So she is basically saying, if Atheism is wrong then by default Christianity is right and the punishment for not believing is hell. She doesn't take into consideration if Atheism is wrong AND Christianity is wrong, BOTH beliefs will be punished. So there is really no point to the question.

Perhaps that occurred before the video began, but I missed the part where the questioner specifically referred to Christianity, so I don't see where you're getting with that. There was still heaven and hell in ancient Greece (who were BTW the first converts to Christianity) and the rules were quite similar. Not that that matters, as you still miss the same point I told you about a hundred times before. I think it's the broken record of "Us vs. Them" thinking that traps you.
I can't say 100% positive that the audience member was Christian, but let me put it this way, I'd bet $100 she was? Why? Because that is a typical question they ask? How do I know? Because they ask ME that same moronic question countless times.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: skace
Vic's assumption was that as long as you believed in any god "Zeus/Woden/Etc", whichever god ended up being at the end of the tunnel would be happy with you and reward you. But that is just that, another assumption, his own set of beliefs, no more right or wrong than any other. And infact, it flies against the texts of most religious works. (Such as how the bible says worship none other than me)
indeed.
Originally posted by: Vic
His argument is like if someone said that snow and nieve (the Spanish word for snow) were not the same thing.
Clearly I cast pearls before swine.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: Vic
How you got that assumption, I have no idea, but you are completely wrong.

"No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages."

You need to explain this better. Because it makes it sound like you are grouping all gods as one being, which IS a belief some people have, usually agnostics, but it is completely WRONG belief as far as any specific religion is concerned and you would go to hell all the same. Perhaps I am misreading what you are saying, I don't know.

Also, by capitalizing "God" you realize you are using the specific christian god? Did you catch that yet?

And if you are trying to define what "god" is, then you realize there were religions that believe in gods of random objects, like the god of trees etc. So by that religion "tree" is "god". Which begs the question, if you are trying to categorize which words can be used as god, where the freaking hell is the guideline?
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,503
136
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: Vic
How you got that assumption, I have no idea, but you are completely wrong.

"No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages."

You need to explain this better. Because it makes it sound like you are grouping all gods as one being, which IS a belief some people have, usually agnostics, but it is completely WRONG belief as far as any specific religion is concerned and you would go to hell all the same. Perhaps I am misreading what you are saying, I don't know.

He's saying that Dawkins was repeating himself, just with the names of different gods.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: ElFenix
nice dodge of the question.
He hit the question head on. You want me to make it a little clearer so you can understand it? What if here's wrong? The same question can be asked of you? What if you are wrong (you being religious)? What happens if Big Foot was the REAL God? You'd be banished to the dark scary eternal wilderness. And now in light of this conversation, I'm sure you wished you'd dedicated your life to Big Foot now. Don't you?

No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages. If "Big Foot" were the name you gave to concept of the universal almighty God, then "Big Foot" would be God. His argument is like if someone said that snow and nieve (the Spanish word for snow) were not the same thing.

He answered it correctly. Zeus is God, but the Greeks have different "punishments" and rewards for believing. What the audience member was getting at was, if Atheism is wrong, then the punshment is hell. So she is basically saying, if Atheism is wrong then by default Christianity is right and the punishment for not believing is hell. She doesn't take into consideration if Atheism is wrong AND Christianity is wrong, BOTH beliefs will be punished. So there is really no point to the question.

Perhaps that occurred before the video began, but I missed the part where the questioner specifically referred to Christianity, so I don't see where you're getting with that. There was still heaven and hell in ancient Greece (who were BTW the first converts to Christianity) and the rules were quite similar. Not that that matters, as you still miss the same point I told you about a hundred times before. I think it's the broken record of "Us vs. Them" thinking that traps you.
I can't say 100% positive that the audience member was Christian, but let me put it this way, I'd bet $100 she was? Why? Because that is a typical question they ask? How do I know? Because they ask ME that same moronic question countless times.
Your argument requires assumption then. That doesn't work.

The PROPER answer is not to insult someone else's personal belief system, but to ask them to respect your personal belief system as you will respect theirs.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: Crono
He's saying that Dawkins was repeating himself, just with the names of different gods.

Ok, so the assumption is that the women could have been an agnostic in the audience asking the question? And based on that, the question would have been what if god is just any being and you are completely against it? If a god existed and it doesn't end up being one of the ones we worship, then I don't think it will even matter what you said on earth, whether you said you do or don't believe. He probably wouldn't even get punished.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: Vic
How you got that assumption, I have no idea, but you are completely wrong.

"No, he dodged it entirely and ignorantly. Zeus is God. Woden is God. Allah is God. Brahman is God. Those are all just different ways of saying the same thing in different languages."

You need to explain this better. Because it makes it sound like you are grouping all gods as one being, which IS a belief some people have, usually agnostics, but it is completely WRONG belief as far as any specific religion is concerned and you would go to hell all the same. Perhaps I am misreading what you are saying, I don't know.

Also, by capitalizing "God" you realize you are using the specific christian god? Did you catch that yet?

And if you are trying to define what "god" is, then you realize there were religions that believe in gods of random objects, like the god of trees etc. So by that religion "tree" is "god". Which begs the question, if you are trying to categorize which words can be used as god, where the freaking hell is the guideline?

Capitalizing God does make it a specific reference to the Christian god. According to Dictionary.com, the capitalized form of the word refers to "1. the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe," while lowercase is "3. (lowercase) one of several deities, esp. a male deity, presiding over some portion of worldly affairs."

Otherwise, you're not misreading, you simply don't know anything about religion (or linguistics, apparently). "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet."
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL, so the athiest religion has found it's messiah.

Classic.

Heh. You got it. And they're ready to go to war against those infidel Christians.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL, so the athiest religion has found it's messiah.

Classic.

Wow, how very teenage of you.

You really think you're different than the evangelicals? The very fact that you feel compelled to answer the question "What if you're wrong?" says that you're not. And let's not get started on loic2003's comments -- switch around a few of his words to reverse the point-of-view, keep the same emotions, and he'd sound exactly like a fundie.

:music: Onward Atheist Soldiers! :music:
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Your argument requires assumption then. That doesn't work.
My argument does require an assumption, but it is definitely not far fetched. She didn't correct him when he said she was of the Christian faith. Would it have made you feel better if Dawkins asked her what her belief was first THEN light into her with the same argument he made?
The PROPER answer is not to insult someone else's personal belief system, but to ask them to respect your personal belief system as you will respect theirs.
The PROPER thing to do is not to ask questions if you aren't ready for the answer. She asked the same moronic question (with a cocky tone to her voice I might add) I've heard SEVERAL times, like it was really going to stump him. You want to talk about assumptions? The question was designed for only two answers, you're right or I'm right. That's it. Talk about assumptions.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL, so the athiest religion has found it's messiah.

Classic.

Wow, how very teenage of you.

It is a very, very accurate statement. Look at the reverance and cries to "follow his teachings!"

It's the athiest religion's messiah.