No he doesn't. We were over-due for a storm like that and it's meaningless in the context of AGW. I think it's funny to see people support silly statements like this just because the person stating them has the same political leanings as themselves.
It's pretty disgraceful how low AGW has sunk over the years. Today they basically spend their days hoping that there will be some form of natural disaster (the same that has been happening since long before there were humans on the earth) so they can climb up on top of a pile of coffins and scream that it wouldn't have happened if we paid higher taxes or voted for a different group of corrupt politicians.
Except the world hasn't really warmed and it has been warmer. Basically everyone is bitching about the unknown because they're scared children. We aren't going through anything unusual.
This guy is completely insane. Using the suffering and hardship of millions of people to make callous and petty political jabs. It's cheap and crude. News flash, this type of radical posting is not helping your party and certainly is not drawing in logical, intellectual and educated independent voters the Democrat party is clamoring for.
lose because of the weather. Their anti government stance screwed them with Katrina and Isaac screwed their convention, then along comes Sandy, the deadly lady that reversed Romney's momentum and tipped the race to Obama. It's not nice to stick your head in the sand and let the Mother Nature blow your ass away. Time to take climate change seriously, no?
Money corrupts no matter where it comes from, be it a corporation that wants results favorable to them or a a scientist who wants to keep the concern alive and the grant-money flowing from governments and other sources.Thank you. It's good to hear the opinion of a professional moron. A lot of them, however get paid for theirs. There are, however, a different kind of professionals called scientists who are bound by experiment and data to corroborate their ideas so no, I'm not your wet dream.
Money corrupts no matter where it comes from, be it a corporation that wants results favorable to them or a a scientist who wants to keep the concern alive and the grant-money flowing from governments and other sources.
Ah, thank you for that peek into your dementia. Your brain must be full of money.
Isn't it amusing that those people who "think" climate was constant until evil mankind changed it call their opponents "climate deniers"?
It is. It has much influence.
Look up Mann's hockey stick graph - proggies canceled the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age in their pursuit of unbridled power.Actually that's not nearly as amusing as your assumption we thought the climate was static. It must be fun to make up shit so you have something to argue. But you're probably right. Nobody ever heard of the Ice Age. Stop sitting on your brain.
Yup, it corrupted it just like you said.
lose because of the weather. Their anti government stance screwed them with Katrina and Isaac screwed their convention, then along comes Sandy, the deadly lady that reversed Romney's momentum and tipped the race to Obama. It's not nice to stick your head in the sand and let the Mother Nature blow your ass away. Time to take climate change seriously, no?
Just the opposite actually
Conservative kids are the ones who live in fear
http://health.usnews.com/health-new...-conservative-study-finds-childhood-influence
The researchers found that children with authoritarian parents were more likely to have conservative political beliefs when they were 18, while those with egalitarian parents were more likely to have liberal beliefs.
The findings held true even after the researchers accounted for factors such as gender, ethnic background and socioeconomic status, according to the study, which was published online this month in the journal Psychological Science.
The findings are consistent with theories from political psychology, said R. Chris Fraley, a psychological scientist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and colleagues.
As for temperament, children who were more fearful when they were between 4 and 5 were more likely to be conservative at age 18, while those who were more active and able to focus their attention were more likely to be liberal at age 18, according to a journal news release.
Same shit we heard in 2005 and then a few years of below average hurricane seasons proves these are just part of a natural cycle that has been going on for as long as we have been keeping records.
1886 -10 Hurricanes of which 4 were major
2012 -10 Hurricanes of which 1 were major
BTW, why arent you directing your rage at Russia and China who are absolutely laying waste to their environment? Did you know that a large portion of the pollution in Los Angeles actually originates from China? But .but .but its the Conservatives fault ..
Just the opposite actually
Conservative kids are the ones who live in fear
http://health.usnews.com/health-new...-conservative-study-finds-childhood-influence
The researchers found that children with authoritarian parents were more likely to have conservative political beliefs when they were 18, while those with egalitarian parents were more likely to have liberal beliefs.
The findings held true even after the researchers accounted for factors such as gender, ethnic background and socioeconomic status, according to the study, which was published online this month in the journal Psychological Science.
The findings are consistent with theories from political psychology, said R. Chris Fraley, a psychological scientist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and colleagues.
As for temperament, children who were more fearful when they were between 4 and 5 were more likely to be conservative at age 18, while those who were more active and able to focus their attention were more likely to be liberal at age 18, according to a journal news release.
They further define it, authorative and authortarian
Authorative have boundaries but still let kids be themselves, authortarian 'daddy knows best'