• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I was dissapointed with bulldozer specs

Onceler

Golden Member
they have 2 integer units to 1 FPU counting this as 2 cores.
would this be a big deal to me? I do video editing and rotoscoping.
I have a hex core phenomII but am waiting to see if it will be worth it to upgrade.
 
they have 2 integer units to 1 FPU counting this as 2 cores.
would this be a big deal to me? I do video editing and rotoscoping.
I have a hex core phenomII but am waiting to see if it will be worth it to upgrade.

*sigh* /facepalm
 
We don't need to make a new thread for every member who has something unsubstantiated ax to grind against a product they have not even seen tested yet, do we?

Surely any of the other existing over-hyped/over-bemoaned bulldozer threads could have been the recipient of the post in the OP without resorting to creating an entirely new thread, couldn't it?
 
Some of the comments in those threads are like listening to a wino blabber on and on about how great and wonderful Ripple is. And just about as coherent. Why do I keep reading them? I guess I can't live without the tic they give me.
 
Yeah I had a 386sx which mainly meant it didn't have a math co-peocessor on it like the DX version did. I remember buying desktop dyno software when I was into circle track racing in Ocala, FL. I would run different cam profile changes and such to see the power curves each camshaft would provide. You talk about slow! The thing was such a dog in anything that required complex math. It was a Tandy 2500 SX? And it could run at 8? mhz or 20 mhz. 🙂
 
Back
Top