I was dissapointed with bulldozer specs

Onceler

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,264
0
71
they have 2 integer units to 1 FPU counting this as 2 cores.
would this be a big deal to me? I do video editing and rotoscoping.
I have a hex core phenomII but am waiting to see if it will be worth it to upgrade.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,396
277
136
they have 2 integer units to 1 FPU counting this as 2 cores.
would this be a big deal to me? I do video editing and rotoscoping.
I have a hex core phenomII but am waiting to see if it will be worth it to upgrade.

*sigh* /facepalm
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,118
58
91
We don't need to make a new thread for every member who has something unsubstantiated ax to grind against a product they have not even seen tested yet, do we?

Surely any of the other existing over-hyped/over-bemoaned bulldozer threads could have been the recipient of the post in the OP without resorting to creating an entirely new thread, couldn't it?
 

Majic 7

Senior member
Mar 27, 2008
668
0
0
Some of the comments in those threads are like listening to a wino blabber on and on about how great and wonderful Ripple is. And just about as coherent. Why do I keep reading them? I guess I can't live without the tic they give me.
 

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,746
740
136
I remember the days when a "CPU Core" didn't include a FPU, that was extra.
 

formulav8

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
7,004
522
126
Yeah I had a 386sx which mainly meant it didn't have a math co-peocessor on it like the DX version did. I remember buying desktop dyno software when I was into circle track racing in Ocala, FL. I would run different cam profile changes and such to see the power curves each camshaft would provide. You talk about slow! The thing was such a dog in anything that required complex math. It was a Tandy 2500 SX? And it could run at 8? mhz or 20 mhz. :)