- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,498
- 9,757
- 146
Heartland by Sarah Smarsh. So, I put it on "hold" at my library. It's about growing up poor . . . and white.
This is the excerpt from the NYT review that prompted my decision:
"From the farm, the book circumambulates several major themes: body, land, shame. Smarsh describes the toll of labor on those who have no choice but to do it — a work force priced out of health insurance by its privatization. Neighbors are maimed by combines and the author’s father nearly dies from chemical poisoning a week into a job transporting used cleaning solvent. Women absorb their husbands’ frustrations, blow by blow. Meanwhile, big agribusinesses strangle the region’s family farms, leaving behind a brackish residue of shame — the shame of being poor and white.
“Poor whiteness,” Smarsh writes, “is a peculiar offense in that society imbues whiteness with power — not just by making it the racial norm next to which the rest are ‘others’ but by using it as a shorthand for economic stability.”
Smarsh is an invaluable guide to flyover country, worth 20 abstract-noun-espousing op-ed columnists. She was raised by those who voted against their own interests. “People on welfare were presumed ‘lazy,’ and for us there was no more hurtful word,” she writes. “Within that framework, financially comfortable liberals may rest assured that their fortunes result from personal merit while generously insisting they be taxed to help the ‘needy.’ Impoverished people, then, must do one of two things: Concede personal failure and vote for the party more inclined to assist them, or vote for the other party, whose rhetoric conveys hope that the labor of their lives is what will compensate them.”
^^^ For parts of the 1980s I worked as a full time political activist for the Pennsylvania Public Interest Coalition, or PennPIC (not to be confused with PennPIRG.) We worked on "non-controversial", "non-partisan" issues like reducing usurious interest rates on credit cards. These were the Reagan years, and it was always frustrating to us how many lower economic status white folks would steadfastly vote against their own best interests.
Above, in just a few lines, Sarah Smarsh eloquently explains why.![Frown :( :(]()
This is the excerpt from the NYT review that prompted my decision:
"From the farm, the book circumambulates several major themes: body, land, shame. Smarsh describes the toll of labor on those who have no choice but to do it — a work force priced out of health insurance by its privatization. Neighbors are maimed by combines and the author’s father nearly dies from chemical poisoning a week into a job transporting used cleaning solvent. Women absorb their husbands’ frustrations, blow by blow. Meanwhile, big agribusinesses strangle the region’s family farms, leaving behind a brackish residue of shame — the shame of being poor and white.
“Poor whiteness,” Smarsh writes, “is a peculiar offense in that society imbues whiteness with power — not just by making it the racial norm next to which the rest are ‘others’ but by using it as a shorthand for economic stability.”
Smarsh is an invaluable guide to flyover country, worth 20 abstract-noun-espousing op-ed columnists. She was raised by those who voted against their own interests. “People on welfare were presumed ‘lazy,’ and for us there was no more hurtful word,” she writes. “Within that framework, financially comfortable liberals may rest assured that their fortunes result from personal merit while generously insisting they be taxed to help the ‘needy.’ Impoverished people, then, must do one of two things: Concede personal failure and vote for the party more inclined to assist them, or vote for the other party, whose rhetoric conveys hope that the labor of their lives is what will compensate them.”
^^^ For parts of the 1980s I worked as a full time political activist for the Pennsylvania Public Interest Coalition, or PennPIC (not to be confused with PennPIRG.) We worked on "non-controversial", "non-partisan" issues like reducing usurious interest rates on credit cards. These were the Reagan years, and it was always frustrating to us how many lower economic status white folks would steadfastly vote against their own best interests.
Above, in just a few lines, Sarah Smarsh eloquently explains why.