before anyone start the flame... no I am not ricing out my car. I have no stickers, my exhaust is stock, my wheels are 14' steel with hubcaps, and no bigass bodykits; AND, I intend to keep it that way.
I do want to though, is to lower the car just a bit and stiffen up the suspenion coz the bodyroll is quite excessive; and yes, who I am lying to, I want to make my car look better.
well, I have 3 options,
1) cut the stock springs
2) get new springs
3) get new springs AND new shocks
so, I asked around, and the general concensus is 1) is SUPER bad, so forget that.
Some say it is a more elegant way to go with 3) coz the "damping rate of the stock shocks will not be able to handle the new springs and eventually breaking the stock shocks." while the other say it's okay to go with 2) since I am not going to drop it aggressively.
so 2) or 3)? I don't want to throw in extra 300 buck unnecessarily for the new shocks when the springs can pretty much archieve what I want.
I do want to though, is to lower the car just a bit and stiffen up the suspenion coz the bodyroll is quite excessive; and yes, who I am lying to, I want to make my car look better.
well, I have 3 options,
1) cut the stock springs
2) get new springs
3) get new springs AND new shocks
so, I asked around, and the general concensus is 1) is SUPER bad, so forget that.
Some say it is a more elegant way to go with 3) coz the "damping rate of the stock shocks will not be able to handle the new springs and eventually breaking the stock shocks." while the other say it's okay to go with 2) since I am not going to drop it aggressively.
so 2) or 3)? I don't want to throw in extra 300 buck unnecessarily for the new shocks when the springs can pretty much archieve what I want.