I wanna be a knight and have my own castle (and a princess too)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jun 19, 2004
10,860
1
81
LOL at the guy who can tell from a pic if a girl's relationship material. You can't tell jack from a photo.....hell, she could have done donkey shows in Mexico for all you know. You can never know for sure until you're with em' and even then it's just your best guess scenario. No guy EVER knows EVERYTHING for sure about his girl.
 

MarkW

Senior member
Sep 12, 2001
355
0
0
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

"This is (almost) someone you could have a nice relationship with."

You have to LOVE ATOT!!! You think you could have a relationship with someone based on her photo. Lovely.

We're talking about being a knight and owning a castle here. LOL

You want sleeping beauty, not 24 yr old office girl that you see around town all the time.

My Point: You'd take that girl to be your princess over Her? :)

She is hot (the blonde), but the brunette has more of a "cute" look to her. I think I would rather have the brunette, different strokes for different folks...

But who am I kidding? they are both out of my league, so who am I to say which one I would rather have? lol
 

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

My Point: You'd take that girl to be your princess over Her? :)

I'd take Miscellaneous Girl #1 over Elisha Cuthbert - who I really never found too terribly attractive but many ATOT fanboys (see above) do seem to like.

There are many people out there who find 'famous' people overwhelmingly attractive simply because they are famous.

 

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,264
3
81
Okay, time for some clarification. My comment on the relationship thing wasn't specific to the picture. When I made that comment, I was thinking more generally - it's like you could see yourself in a relationship with someone who looks like that girl. In short, I'm stereotyping.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,101
3
56
:laugh:

Damn nerds fighting over women they wouldn't have a snowball's chance with :D

Hahaha, kills me every time :D
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
Originally posted by: Babbles
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

My Point: You'd take that girl to be your princess over Her? :)

I'd take Miscellaneous Girl #1 over Elisha Cuthbert - who I really never found too terribly attractive but many ATOT fanboys (see above) do seem to like.

There are many people out there who find 'famous' people overwhelmingly attractive simply because they are famous.

Sigh. It has nothing to do with fame. I don't have the time to go run out and snap shots of better looking women out on the street.

Elisha is prettier than that girl though. I'm no fanboy, but she's much more attrative than that other girl. But I wasn't intentionally singling out Elisha. My point was (which you apparently didn't get) Is that there are much better looking women in this world that that girl. If your going to dream, why settle.

But I guess all of you think she's the most beautiful girl in the world. Have fun with her. LOL
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
there are a lot of castles for sale worldwide.

Dark and dampy is what most of them are...

If I had a lot of cash, it'd be nice to own one for themed parties. It'd have to be in a moderate climate (which is where fewest of them are for sale).

There are broker/agent firms specializing in purely castle and keep sales.
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: preslove
Knights didn't get castles. Barrons, counts, dukes, kings, etc. had castles. Knights were just the soldiers.

edit: Actually, usually only kings and dukes had castles. A barron or count might have a keep or fort or something smaller.

Knights were the elite soldiers of their day. They were required to maintain respect, loyalty and chivelry. They were the gentlemens version of todays special forces.
 

Kelvrick

Lifer
Feb 14, 2001
18,422
5
81
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: preslove
Knights didn't get castles. Barrons, counts, dukes, kings, etc. had castles. Knights were just the soldiers.

edit: Actually, usually only kings and dukes had castles. A barron or count might have a keep or fort or something smaller.

Knights were the elite soldiers of their day. They were required to maintain respect, loyalty and chivelry. They were the gentlemens version of todays special forces.

Thats how it was supposed to be anyway, aside from the ones who raped and pillaged at will because of their superior birth. But, I figure they threw the wenches a couple coppers for their trouble after they were done.

Ahh, those were the days, except if you were poor, then it'd suck. Unless you found some knight that raped your sister/wife fallen into the mud in full armor, then you could stab him in the eye.