Fern
Elite Member
- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 174
- 106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
-snip-
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form.
Bwuhahaha
Fern
Originally posted by: eskimospy
-snip-
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form.
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: eskimospy
-snip-
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form.
Bwuhahaha
Fern
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234
Obama is getting a hell of a lot right, but how can that be debated with the criticisms lack any points to debate, they're just about 'worrying for our nation'?
I can't even make sense of some of the comments like how they're the 'ends justify the means' crew. What ends and what means? That's help when making the attack.
Expanding the national debt even further to satisfy liberal constituencies on unproven, ill thought out policies without public scrutiny and discussion is anything but right. I'm personally happy to see some changes in the foreign policy arena but Obama's budget and economic policies will doom this nation.
What I meant to say is:
Some conservatives in the GWB presidency believed what they did was right, and the end justify the means (doing anything to deceit the public to build support for the Iraq war, for instance)
Liberals in power do the same thing: You believe that UHC is the way to go, so your reps try to push it through without public input/consultation. You think the government can fix anything so your president increases funding for most departments, even though the problem lies in inefficiency of government agencies. Your "stimulus package" involves mostly long term spending and not much short term relieve to the economy, which could be debated by itself (if the economy can really be "propped up") but your president still lied to the public about America being screwed if we don't pass his "stimulus package".
What happened to being truthful to the American people when your messiah's budget is based on unrealistic numbers on economic growth (basically lying to people who had hopium)? To push forward an agenda when we have record deficit and debt while foreigners will less likely buy our debt? Even some democrats are starting to question Obama's competency.
Lay off on the hopium and give the Obama administration the scrutiny it deserves, instead of just taking anything his administration says as truth.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form. Furthermore the opposite party is in charge of Congress as when Clinton was in office. I do find it funny however that our government working the way it's supposed to, without having a tyrannical executive dominating every part of it, is now somehow viewed as the president being weak and rubber stamping everything. You guys need to pick up a book and learn how our government is supposed to function, and then go read some newspapers and see that the executive has had a lot of input into what has been going on. Stop with the fucking extreme paranoia already.
The two branches are working together as equals, the way it's supposed to be. If you guys wanted a de facto dictatorship of the executive like we used to have, we should have just given Bush a third term.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form. Furthermore the opposite party is in charge of Congress as when Clinton was in office. I do find it funny however that our government working the way it's supposed to, without having a tyrannical executive dominating every part of it, is now somehow viewed as the president being weak and rubber stamping everything. You guys need to pick up a book and learn how our government is supposed to function, and then go read some newspapers and see that the executive has had a lot of input into what has been going on. Stop with the fucking extreme paranoia already.
The two branches are working together as equals, the way it's supposed to be. If you guys wanted a de facto dictatorship of the executive like we used to have, we should have just given Bush a third term.
LOL! Passing legislation you haven't read = incompetent. It's exactly the same as signing a contract you haven't read. It's almost the very definition of incompetent.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The only people that use the term "messiah" are diehard republicans.
I guess GWB was YOUR "messiah."
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Congress is not incompetent in any way, shape, or form. Furthermore the opposite party is in charge of Congress as when Clinton was in office. I do find it funny however that our government working the way it's supposed to, without having a tyrannical executive dominating every part of it, is now somehow viewed as the president being weak and rubber stamping everything. You guys need to pick up a book and learn how our government is supposed to function, and then go read some newspapers and see that the executive has had a lot of input into what has been going on. Stop with the fucking extreme paranoia already.
The two branches are working together as equals, the way it's supposed to be. If you guys wanted a de facto dictatorship of the executive like we used to have, we should have just given Bush a third term.
LOL! Passing legislation you haven't read = incompetent. It's exactly the same as signing a contract you haven't read. It's almost the very definition of incompetent.
No, it's really not. You understand that's what they have staff for, right? The job of a Congressman is not to sit there reading bills all day attempting to parse the language.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The only people that use the term "messiah" are diehard republicans.
I guess GWB was YOUR "messiah."
I guess you failed at grade school reading comprehension. I didn't vote for GWB as I have stated previously. I think the current mess is the collective failure of both Democrats and Republicans for the past 15-20 years and Obama supporters like you foolishly believe that he would actually change anything for the better.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The only people that use the term "messiah" are diehard republicans.
I guess GWB was YOUR "messiah."
I guess you failed at grade school reading comprehension. I didn't vote for GWB as I have stated previously. I think the current mess is the collective failure of both Democrats and Republicans for the past 15-20 years and Obama supporters like you foolishly believe that he would actually change anything for the better.
You could claim whatever you want on the internet, doesn't make it true. Calling a president a "messiah" as some lame attempt at bashing him and his supports are absolutely pathetic.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234
Obama is getting a hell of a lot right, but how can that be debated with the criticisms lack any points to debate, they're just about 'worrying for our nation'?
I can't even make sense of some of the comments like how they're the 'ends justify the means' crew. What ends and what means? That's help when making the attack.
Expanding the national debt even further to satisfy liberal constituencies on unproven, ill thought out policies without public scrutiny and discussion is anything but right. I'm personally happy to see some changes in the foreign policy arena but Obama's budget and economic policies will doom this nation.
What I meant to say is:
Some conservatives in the GWB presidency believed what they did was right, and the end justify the means (doing anything to deceit the public to build support for the Iraq war, for instance)
Liberals in power do the same thing: You believe that UHC is the way to go, so your reps try to push it through without public input/consultation. You think the government can fix anything so your president increases funding for most departments, even though the problem lies in inefficiency of government agencies. Your "stimulus package" involves mostly long term spending and not much short term relieve to the economy, which could be debated by itself (if the economy can really be "propped up") but your president still lied to the public about America being screwed if we don't pass his "stimulus package".
What happened to being truthful to the American people when your messiah's budget is based on unrealistic numbers on economic growth (basically lying to people who had hopium)? To push forward an agenda when we have record deficit and debt while foreigners will less likely buy our debt? Even some democrats are starting to question Obama's competency.
Lay off on the hopium and give the Obama administration the scrutiny it deserves, instead of just taking anything his administration says as truth.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
We have doubled the amount of Federal money spent on eduction and yet the results seem to be the same.
Originally posted by: spidey07
What are you talking about? He campaigned on destroying the country fast and that's exactly what he is doing. No surprise here. He's doing exactly what he said he would do and you fools voted for him.
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
How is UHC is a bigger picture? We never needed UHC system in the past 200+ years
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
How is UHC is a bigger picture? We never needed UHC system in the past 200+ years of this country's history and we certainly don't need it now. Same for free health care for all children, we never needed it in the past and now we call it a necessity? I don't give a shit about political correctness so I am just speaking from my heart. So flame me or call me evil if you want to.
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
How is UHC is a bigger picture? We never needed UHC system in the past 200+ years of this country's history and we certainly don't need it now. Same for free health care for all children, we never needed it in the past and now we call it a necessity? I don't give a shit about political correctness so I am just speaking from my heart. So flame me or call me evil if you want to.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Let's look at education for a second...
Figures from the 2009 budget:
In 2000 the budget for the Department of Education was $33 billion.
In 2008 the budget for the Department of Education was $66 billion.
We have doubled the amount of Federal money spent on eduction and yet the results seem to be the same.
Why should we throw even MORE money at this problem when the past clearly shows that more money does not provide us with better results.
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Let's look at education for a second...
Figures from the 2009 budget:
In 2000 the budget for the Department of Education was $33 billion.
In 2008 the budget for the Department of Education was $66 billion.
We have doubled the amount of Federal money spent on eduction and yet the results seem to be the same.
Why should we throw even MORE money at this problem when the past clearly shows that more money does not provide us with better results.
One quote "No child left behind" was and is a failure. For the last 3 years of the Bush administration, folks even from his own party said the policy needed to be changed but he put forth no changes. The mess that we see now is because of change. I guarantee to you, all the wall street stuff would have been swept under the rug if McCain had been elected. The details we have been able to get about what has really been going down in the last 8 years is flatout because Obama has brought transparency. We can only hope that they can fix it. Some of this financial stuff you can't even blame Bush for. One thing Obama has said that is spot on, unfortunately for us this has been the culture for Wall Street. That is what we need to change. He even said on Leno which I thought was very sobering, that all this stuff these companies have done has been legal. That is disturbing, troubling, and scary all at the same time. I believe he can start us down the right road, but its going to take some time.
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
How is UHC is a bigger picture? We never needed UHC system in the past 200+ years of this country's history and we certainly don't need it now. Same for free health care for all children, we never needed it in the past and now we call it a necessity? I don't give a shit about political correctness so I am just speaking from my heart. So flame me or call me evil if you want to.
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
The world is never a fair place. The problem with the rising of the health care cost begin when medical insurance surface. Before there were medical insurance, even average joe can afford doctor visit, however, this change when medical insurance as doctors and hospital start giving the most expensive service and most expensive medication as they know it is going to be covered by the insurance. This in term cause the rise in medical insurance cost and now normal people can't afford it.
A big picture you say, two of the biggest agenda Obama have are green energy and UHC. As for green energy, ti sound good on paper, but it will never be as effective as nuclear energy. People are still complaining about the Three mile island incident, but that was a man made accident and technology have improve over the years. Less dependent on foreign oil he claim, why not drill on our own. The left claim it pollute the environment, but every country including Cuba and China are literally drill oil right in front of us. The sea is going to be polluted just the same even us benefiting. So why ntoi start drilling ourself and try to keep the damage to the mininial. Alos, he of his slogan during the elevation was that even if we drill, we won;t see a drop of oil in years, so why noy start now and when the oil price start rising again we will have a supply of our own oil.
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Oil might not last forever, but will last long enough for us to figure something out. Until we can build electric car that run as good or fast and cheap as gas car and airplane that can run entirely on electric, we will need oil. Then tell me why all the fight against nuclear if green energy is good? As I recall correctly, it is the left who are against the nuclear energy the most. France is using it, China is using it and so how come we haven;t build a single power plant in decades? Building a nuclear near CA would surely cheapen their energy cost as they won;t need to buy expensive energy from Canada.
