-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
I think this was a classy move
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
First
Lifer
rofl. OK, so Obama and McCain have no integrity, but Ron Paul does?
You Paulbots are so transparent. Next you'll be telling us Paul doesn't believe in evolution because he has "integrity", or that he runs as a Republican (when he's really a Libertarian) because he has "integrity". It can't be because he wants to win elections. It just can't!! :laugh:
That's the baseline for class.
It's no more classy than Rep. Castle was here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1nmn2zRMc
It's no more classy than Rep. Castle was here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1nmn2zRMc
Atomic Playboy
Lifer
This world would be a lot simpler if the Rs and Ds would just beat each other to death already. All this nonsensical bickering, and not a single logical point made by either side. Debate has been completely replaced by irrational fear and hatred, and the screaming that accompanies these emotions. People who want to have a legitimate discussion about the issues have to resort to talking to people who already agree with them, because if they seek out a dissenting opinion, all they get is ad hominem attacks and "YOU LIE!" Both parties should be ashamed. But they egg on their supporters, encouraging the blind partisanship. Kudos to Obama for at least paying lip service to the idea that maybe blind partisanship isn't what this country needs.
Now let's see him put it into practice.
And let's see Republicans do the same.
bamacre
Lifer
They aren't opposed to his escalation of the war in Afghanistan. They aren't opposed to his failure to close Guantanamo. His support for the continuance of the Patriot Act, war on drugs, DoD budget increase. His idea of "indefinite detention." His failure to increase financial regulation. I could probably go on.
bamacre
Lifer
Your entire argument here is nothing but straw man, which is nothing new for you, so I'm not shocked. And neither should you be when I don't feel the need to respond, especially when your posts are nothing more than straw man arguments. Sorry to burst your little bubble, but you aren't important to me.
First
Lifer
^ Huh? You don't see the relevance in referencing other politician's integrity (be it Paul or McCain or whoever) in an argument about a politician's integrity, eh? :laugh:
The fact that you can't see the sad, abject hypocrisy in saying Obama has no integrity, while simultaneously claiming Paul does (er, actually sort of wimping out of taking a stance either way), despite irrefutable evidence previously listed, is nowhere near a straw man and absolutely hilarious to point out in the threads you troll in. Get used to it kiddo.
The fact that you can't see the sad, abject hypocrisy in saying Obama has no integrity, while simultaneously claiming Paul does (er, actually sort of wimping out of taking a stance either way), despite irrefutable evidence previously listed, is nowhere near a straw man and absolutely hilarious to point out in the threads you troll in. Get used to it kiddo.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
