Originally posted by: BrownTown
so called 'experts' can never like mainstream stuff, just the way their heads work. Go into a bookstore and ask the clerk what their favourite book is and it will be something you've never heard of, ask a movie buff what their favourite film is and it was probably some obscure film. Ask a computer enthusiest what he best processor is and thye have to say AMD, otherwise all the people mentioned above are just agreeing the ordinary joes and their 'expert' opinions arent any differnet then anyone elses.
Obviously thats an exageration, but the point is still there, people wh oconsider themselves in hte know are likely to choose a nonestablishment canidate in order to differentiate themsleves from the pack. Of course AMD really is better for alot of stuff, but that don't mean Intel don't do some stuff right too. Anyways, waht were looking at in the cedar mill is a chip that costs Intel jack sh|t (65nm means die size so small), and that overclocks very well. So AMDs processors may be better, but you can bet Intel is raking in the $$$ producing processors at smaller process nodes. At any point Intel can drop the bottom out of its pricing and send AMD to the grave, of course if it does then Intel will get broken up by the monopoly laws, but hte fact of the matter is that AMD exists because Intel isn't allowed to kill it, not because its processors pwn Intels. Not sure what that has to do with the origional topic, but its late and im procrastinating so i might as well rant/ramble...