I think I nuked my CPU

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Powermoloch

Lifer
Jul 5, 2005
10,084
4
76
Originally posted by: order66
At one time didn't AMD have a fail safe mode called ''ANTI-BURN?''


Yeah, just a curiousity, I wonder if the motheboard had some fail safe option in the bios..unless something fishy is happenin @_@
 

orangat

Golden Member
Jun 7, 2004
1,579
0
0
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: order66
At one time didn't AMD have a fail safe mode called ''ANTI-BURN?''


Yeah, just a curiousity, I wonder if the motheboard had some fail safe option in the bios..unless something fishy is happenin @_@

I asked about this in my earlier post.

The thermal protection circuit is supposed to kick in and shutdown the cpu. The fact that it took 20+ secs to fry means something must've kicked in.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Just a note.....I was reading in a different forum that both AMD and Intel have the means to know if you were at fault....

 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Just a note.....I was reading in a different forum that both AMD and Intel have the means to know if you were at fault....

yeah i guess the CPU looking all black and blown up may give it away.
 

Yoshi911

Senior member
Feb 11, 2006
393
1
76
Originally posted by: blackrain
Originally posted by: dawza
Originally posted by: blackrain
There should be a failsafe for this. I'm not an engineer and don't know how easy or difficult it would be to implement something like that, but AMD and intel should really come up with something to prevent such situations. There's a lot of amateurs these days learning how to build their own rig. Every day there's a new post in here about someone building a pc. Things have really changed. And i'm sure the processor manufacturers recognize this.

I'm not saying that the OP is right...he certainly isn't. He shouldn't con his way out if his mistake.

What I am saying is that AMD and Intel are in a better position (than the average consumer) to prevent such mistakes that could damage the product. We're talking about processors here. Its a sophisticated product that requires care beyond what the average person would normally take.

Edit: yes it was a stupid mistake but lets not be so hard on this guy. I KNOW there are plenty that have made that mistake!


We are giving the OP a hard time not because he made a stupid mistake, but because his post gives the impression that he knew NOT to run the CPU without a heatsink, yet he went ahead and did so anyway (if this was simply an error made in carelessness, I apologize for my assumption). To make matters worse, he now plans to blatently lie to AMD's face and claim that any damage done was not a user, but rather, a manufacturer error (no assumptions here).

I agree that it would be nice if there were a failsafe mechanism where PC components never got damaged due to heat- however, I do not believe the manufacturers have a responsibility to absolutely ensure this- certainly, overheating due to lack of a heatsink (near-instantaneous) versus overheating due to inadequate cooling (more gradual) are very different things. Manufacturers should (and do) provide safeguards against the latter, as such could be the result of an improperly seated heatsink, overly high ambient temps, lack of case ventillation, defective processor, defective sensor, defective CPU fan, etc- all conditions which are not associated solely with gross end user neglect. Running a processor sans heatsink is a different matter altogether- the end user forgot to attach the heatsink --> processor fries --> SOL- no question as to who the responsible party is.

The bulk of the responsibility with respect to properly using a (non-defective/well-manufactured) product should and must lie in the hands of the end user. As you stated, and I agree, building a PC is not something to be taken lightly. Carelessness, laziness, and idiocy do not mix well with expensive electronic hardware; unqualified individuals who choose to tinker irregardless, and then try to screw manufacturers with fraudulent RMAs only make it more expensive for everyone in the end.


What serves consumers (and manufacturers) better . . . people being dishonest and submitting rma's for their stupid mistakes (which raises the price for everyone) or the manufacturer building in failsafe features to prevent damage from people's stupid mistakes from the start.

I know its hard to draw a line between what sort of stupid mistakes or problems can or can't be anticipated. Ultimately the manufacturer can't account for everything. I've just observed too many people making this mistake or similar mistakes (not plugging in the fan) and it would seem like it would be simple to just prevent this altogether.

I agree 100% as to who the responsible party is. I'm just saying that in light of the growing number of amateurs building rigs, maybe manufacturers should start making this stuff so that it doesn't require a trained professional to install. Go with the flow, not against it.


Sry no I thought that after maybe...10mins It might hurt something but for only under a minute?? I had no idea. lol, I should stop talking..
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Just a note.....I was reading in a different forum that both AMD and Intel have the means to know if you were at fault....

yeah i guess the CPU looking all black and blown up may give it away.

Actually they do have equipment that they can use to see if it was defective or if you screwed it up.....