I think I might need a lawyer (whore hit my car)

zixxer

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2001
7,326
0
0
Okay.. in sept.

here's one:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=38&threadid=1150296&FTVAR_MSGDBTABLE=arc

Here's the police report:
"
Driver #1 stated the she was in the main drive between the parking areas. She advised that she was backing up to get a parking space and did not see vehicle #2.
Driver #2 stated that he was backing out of a parking space when vehicle # 2 back up and struck his vehicle
"

So. I go to the magistrate court and filled out a statement of claim. Here is her response:

"I DENT the clain of the Plaintiff as follows: Defendant denies they are indepted to plaintiff in this matter. He is without information as to any damages sustained to the pllaintiff; thus, strict proof of the same is demanded. For defendant's defenses, he would stat the comlaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant would also assert lack of jurisdiction over their person and improper venue and insufficiency of service of process. Defendant would aver that the plaintiff's own contributory and comparative negligence caused the accident in question, as such, plaintiff's claims are barred and/or should be reduced due to the percentage of the plaintiff's own negligence. Pending additional investigation and discovery, defendant avers that should it be shown that plaintiff sustained injury, then, in that event, the defendant avers that the conditions are totally, or, at least, in part, due to a preexisting or subsequent injury and/or health condition which did not have its origin in the accident in question. Consequently, the defendant should not be hold responsible for the plaintiff's present physical condition.
"

WTFWTFWTF. All those typo's are what her "lawyer" actually screwed up on. Do I need a lawyer or is this a bunch of b.s. WTF does half that crap mean? assert lack of jurisdiction over their person and improper venue and insufficiency of service of process??

HELP! PLEASE!@
 

zixxer

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2001
7,326
0
0
i dunno.. i thought since it's magistrates court the whole idea is so a regular person can sue someone without the need of a lawyer.
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,055
4,492
136
And how, exactly, does any of that make her a whore?
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Dang, didn't you just get rear-ended this summer?

Now wouldn't that make HIM the whore? :p

But yes my friend, you certainly need to get a lawyer. Where in Atlanta did this happen at?
 

zixxer

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2001
7,326
0
0
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Dang, didn't you just get rear-ended this summer?

Now wouldn't that make HIM the whore? :p

But yes my friend, you certainly need to get a lawyer. Where in Atlanta did this happen at?

cherokee
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,071
744
126
You need a lawyer because of the accident or because she is suing you for libel?
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
IANAL, but I'll take a st@b at it:
  • "I DENT the clain of the Plaintiff as follows: Defendant denies they are indepted to plaintiff in this matter. He is without information as to any damages sustained to the pllaintiff; thus, strict proof of the same is demanded. For defendant's defenses, he would stat the comlaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
She doesn't owe you any money, because you haven't provided estimates, or proof of the damage.
  • Defendant would also assert lack of jurisdiction over their person and improper venue and insufficiency of service of process.
You took your complaint to the wrong place.
  • Defendant would aver that the plaintiff's own contributory and comparative negligence caused the accident in question, as such, plaintiff's claims are barred and/or should be reduced due to the percentage of the plaintiff's own negligence.
You contributed to the accident.
  • Pending additional investigation and discovery, defendant avers that should it be shown that plaintiff sustained injury, then, in that event, the defendant avers that the conditions are totally, or, at least, in part, due to a preexisting or subsequent injury and/or health condition which did not have its origin in the accident in question. Consequently, the defendant should not be hold responsible for the plaintiff's present physical condition."
You were injured before the accident, and are now claiming your health problems were caused by the accident. The defendent calls BS.
 

fumbduck

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,349
0
76
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: fumbduck
i'd atleast try to get some free sex out of it.

if she gave him FREE sex, would she still be a whore??

Excellent point.

Just tell her to have sex with you a few times to cover the damage, find the going rate on a crazy bitch in the area, and then set that as the price.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
That sucks, but for something so low-end damage wise the 50/50 split will indeed probably be your best bet. I was in one accident in my life while driving (6 while not - I guess I'm bad luck), and it was a 50/50 split because often times accidents are difficult to proove who's at fault, at least insofar as the whiney bitchy defendent sees it.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
76
Send the letter back and ask for a translation with proper grammar and spell checking