I said it before
Neocons traded in their spandex and glam rock for flannel and grunge.
Ahh, so you're not a social conservative after all - your position on circumcision in the other thread had me fooled.
Yup, they'll probably split soon although I doubt before the current elections. Hopefully they'll split and be big enough to at least throw Ross Perots out there every now and then to shake things up.This 100%.
Until they split off they are just hijackers.
Look at their backers to get a true picture of the hijacking that took place...Armey, Hannity, Koch brothers, etc. All former neocons.
Losing the Senate lol. O'Donnell fixed that for ya. Now that she's a, he, he, serious candidate, all her nutbag speaches are being spewed across the airwaves as I type. Good luck with that.
Add to that Nevada, should have been a shoe in for the Repugs, but the wingnuts got their primary candidate and it's neck and neck now. People in this country aren't as extreme as you think.
As the Tea Party and all good Americans celebrate the 223rd anniversary of The Constitution and moves this country back to it's principles we must all do our part to ensure the assault on liberty and institution of tyranny are fought and defeated. Now is the time patriots, ready yourself, your family, your friends for November 2, liberty's last stand.
I swear if I hear one more grandiose incantation of the Tea Party...
The Tea Party may have grand ideals but the execution of those ideals isnt possible in the real world..
I am a fiscal conservative in how I run my life and approach finances. I have been a member of the republican party as far back as 1979. The mainstream republican party has moved so far to the right of me-and many like me btw- that I am labeled a leftist socialist because I advocate for the poor and like programs that help the downtrodden get back on their feet.
I have asked this question of many so called tea partiers... Ok we get you want smaller government. So what substantive action will you take to make the government smaller? You can rail on bailouts and handouts to the poor and wealth redistribution but the facts are the majority of Tea partiers like social security. They like wars, they like 70-80 percent of what the actual federal government does for them. Talking about shutting down the government-joe miller- and talking about privatizing social security out in the open will be so unpopular they will get laughed out of Washington.
Remember Newts government shutdown?
Taxes are lower now than they have been since the 60s.... Has any tea partier acknowledged this fact?
They can rail about bailouts but the two biggest ones were reletively cheap and have almost been payed back in full-banks-automotive- and in a few cases actually made money.
If you look at the tea party its essentially the same as its been for the last 300 years... White people afraid that the world is changing too quickly around them. The southern strategy has stoked this fire and the fire always becomes more visible during an economic downturn.. The xenophobia and fear are but symptoms of the malaise of people being out of work and looking for a scapegoat...
We are in a paradigm shift from a majority of white people in the US to white people becoming the minority.. Within the next 30 years Latin Americans will outnumber white people in this country and they are terrified of this fact.
We can agree in principle we need to lower the deficits... So how does wanting tax cuts for rich people jibe with the fact that that tax cut will cost more than the stimulus when its all said and done with?
The tea party has already been userped by the social conservatives with their basic agenda to make everyone in their image.... How is that freedom?
Why don't you tell us - specifically - where that "20 - 30%" reduction in the federal budget will come from. It's easy to say "pork is bad," but why don't you tell us specifically what you would eliminate and how much of a budget reduction you would accomplish.I personally would LOVE a reduction of 20 - 30% of the federal budget. Why? Because pork has become prolific and many, many federal departments are superfluous to the well being of this nation. I would start with eliminating the Department of Education, a job for the States. In fact, many federal departments and programs, like environmental protection, usurp or duplicate state programs.
Social engineering at the cost of huge national debt is not feasible or effective. Keep a safety net going, like unemployment insurance and medal subsidies for basic needs, but it is time to turn away from the nanny state which has become so popular for keeping pols in office and their constituents more destitute in the end.
We need to reduce cost and tighten the belt of federal spending significantly. Prioritize national defense and infrastructure and get out of the business of private industry.
Meh. All that needs to be done is for the Tea Party candidates to talk. When Granny hears that they want to cancel Social Security and Medicare, she won't vote for them. When nonfundamentalists hear about their stances on religion in public schools, science, etc. They won't vote for them either.
And hating gay people and fretting over masturbation will really bring in that young people vote!
Since defense is one of the biggest cash cows of the budget and full of corruption and pork spending, and we have more planes, ships, etc. than all of rest of the world combined, Why is it that no one in the tea party talks about defense cuts? Only programs that benefit the poor or aged seem to get referred to as unnecessary.
Defense is 1/3. Social security and Medicare are the other 2/3. I say slash them all in half. Every year. Then void all government backed pensions. Finally repeal all laws favoring Unions. Only then can things come to a happy equilibrium.
Less government, more freedom! Patriots, gather up and show your support. We can win, we must win, we will win!
Why don't you tell us - specifically - where that "20 - 30%" reduction in the federal budget will come from. It's easy to say "pork is bad," but why don't you tell us specifically what you would eliminate and how much of a budget reduction you would accomplish.
Like most other know-nothing, right-wing fools, you're all slogans and no solutions.
The difference between touting/supporting the Tea Party movement and worshipping Obama is the Tea Party is an idea. A movement with no defined leader. Obama is a man.
VAST difference.
Now, I have never posted about the Tea Party, nor do I consider myself a member. But for you to compare Obama worship to Tea Party followers is pretty damn silly. There is a VAST difference between worshiping a man and touting an idea.
I'm glad Liberals feel threatened by something for a change.
