I successfully summited Mt. Rainier

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

everman

Lifer
Nov 5, 2002
11,288
1
0
Nice job, a bit surprising that only 2 people were able to finish besides the guide. What's the ranking in difficulty for this mountain?
 

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,882
380
126
Originally posted by: everman
Nice job, a bit surprising that only 2 people were able to finish besides the guide. What's the ranking in difficulty for this mountain?

Only 2 people on my particular rope team summited, but several in my group summited. I don't know the exact numbers, but I think we started with 19, and I think about 12 made it all the way to the top.

This is the Rainier Mountaineering description of the climb I took.

According to the site above, this climb has "the reputation as the hardest endurance climb in the lower forty-eight states."
 

mpitts

Lifer
Jun 9, 2000
14,732
1
81
Originally posted by: NuclearNed
Originally posted by: mpitts
Any thread that can drop a "Better Off Dead" reference is worth five stars to me.

:D

BTW, congrats. That is so freakin' cool.

Wow, someone else remembers that movie???

YOU'RE EXCEEDING THE SPEED LIMIT, LAYNE MEYER!
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
What would the rough cost be of doing a climb such as you did?
 

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,882
380
126
Originally posted by: KK
What would the rough cost be of doing a climb such as you did?

The guide cost about $850.
The equipment rental was about $450.
With food, lodging, airfare, etc., I estimate the whole trip cost me $2500. This price also covers all siteseeing we did during the entire week.

There are longer climbs offered by Rainier Mountaineering, but they are more expensive. Also, my buddy and I asked our employers to sponsor us in return for a little positive publicity. We each got $500 from our respective employers, which whittles down my out-of-pocket to about $2000.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
nice ... I hiked part of Rainier when I went to Seattle last summer... Very cool place... Didn't do any climbing... went on a back trail that took you to extinct lava tubes... that was very fun.
 

bigrash

Lifer
Feb 20, 2001
17,648
28
91
wow it looks so beautiful out there. congratulations!

and thanks for sharing the pics
 
Jun 19, 2004
10,860
1
81
Something to be proud of indeed.


I'm no expert in climbing by any means, but isn't it a bad idea to wear jeans? Cotton and cold wet conditions don't mix well, no?
 

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,882
380
126
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Something to be proud of indeed.


I'm no expert in climbing by any means, but isn't it a bad idea to wear jeans? Cotton and cold wet conditions don't mix well, no?

Jeans or any cotton clothes would be murder up there. I don't think anyone in any of the pics is wearing jeans, but I could be wrong. Virtually everything we wore was gortex.
 

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,786
5,941
146
Originally posted by: NuclearNed
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Awesome!

What mountain is that in the distance in #170?

I was out to Mt. Rainier about 2 years ago, but I didnt summit. I just climbed for half a day, then turned around.

I think the near mountain is Mt. Adams, then on the far horizon to the right of the pic is Mt. Hood. If someone knows for sure that I'm wrong, then please correct me.

Confirmed. I see that picture quite often, minus the nearby snow in the foreground:)
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Congrats,
This is definitely on my to do list as well...
Congrats
 

cmv

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
3,490
0
76
Awesome but in your victory picture there is some more mountain in the background :).
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: NuclearNed
Originally posted by: mpitts
Any thread that can drop a "Better Off Dead" reference is worth five stars to me.

:D

BTW, congrats. That is so freakin' cool.

Wow, someone else remembers that movie???


Was a paperboy on a bike waiting for you at the top asking for his $2?
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Congratulations on a difficult hike. I climbed Mt. Saint Helens last year and that really beat me up. It was like walking up a sand dune because of all the ash. You take 3 steps up, but you slid 2 back in the process.

Mt. Rainier looked absolutely massive in the area. You can see it from everywhere in the region.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Rainier is massive. IIRC, it's the 2nd largest mountain by volume (after Shasta), and has the largest glacier volume, in the continental US. And its prominence (or independent rise above the surrounding land) is among the highest in the world. Long story short, it's bigger and taller than any mountain in Colorado.
My fav mountain is Hood, as I grew up in its shadow and love its craggy pyramidal shape, but I'll be the first to admit that it's almost tiny compared to Rainier.
It's a hell of a climb. Everest is next for the OP. ;)
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Rainier is massive. IIRC, it's the 2nd largest mountain by volume (after Shasta), and has the largest glacier volume, in the continental US. And its prominence (or independent rise above the surrounding land) is among the highest in the world. Long story short, it's bigger and taller than any mountain in Colorado.
My fav mountain is Hood, as I grew up in it shadow and love its craggy pyramidal shape, but I'll be the first to admit that it's almost tiny compared to Rainier.
It's a hell of a climb. Everest is next for the OP. ;)

That's worth pointing out. I've been to a few different mountain ranges and it's hard to tell how big a mountain is based on its elevation. Pikes Peak is 14,110 feet high, but the elevation at the base is about 8,000 feet up, leaving about an 6,000 foot rise. The Cascades are very impressive because they rise almost from sea level. There is nothing obscuring their view because it's not a mountain range, it's a bunch of volcanos.

Mt. Everest has the highest elevation at the summit, but the base is at 16,000 feet, rising 13,000 feet more. Compare this to a 14,000 foot mountain that rises from a base of 2,000 feet, and you'll see that the apparent size of the mountain from the ground is nearly the same. Of course it would be much harder to breathe on Everest though.

 

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,882
380
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Rainier is massive. IIRC, it's the 2nd largest mountain by volume (after Shasta), and has the largest glacier volume, in the continental US. And its prominence (or independent rise above the surrounding land) is among the highest in the world. Long story short, it's bigger and taller than any mountain in Colorado.
My fav mountain is Hood, as I grew up in its shadow and love its craggy pyramidal shape, but I'll be the first to admit that it's almost tiny compared to Rainier.
It's a hell of a climb. Everest is next for the OP. ;)

I think my mountain climbing jones is satisfied for now. We had a climbing party back at base camp (beer & pizza all around) and someone asked if we would do it again. Almost everyone said that they would, but it would have to be a year or two before anyone wanted to repeat. There are other things on the list I would want to do first before doing Rainier again...

As far as it being higher than any mountain in Colorado... are you sure that is accurate? I think Rainier is the 5th tallest in the lower 48 states, but other than Mt. Whitney I'm not sure what the other taller mountains are.