I present to you the 2013 POTUS.

Danube

Banned
Dec 10, 2009
613
0
0
Good man and a tea party fav - from 2003:

TIKRIT, Iraq (CNN) -- The commanding general of the 4th Infantry Division on Friday accepted a U.S. military investigator's recommendation and ordered administrative action against Lt. Col. Allen West, who was accused of using improper methods to force information out of an Iraqi detainee...

Following a military hearing, West was fined $5,000 over two months, according to West's civillian attorney, Neal Puck

The case stems from an incident August 20 at a military base in Taji, just north of Baghdad, when West was interrogating an Iraqi policeman, who was believed to have information about a plot to assassinate West with an ambush on a U.S. convoy...

West said he also threatened to kill Hamoody. Military prosecutors say West followed up on that threat by taking the suspect outside, put him on the ground near a weapons clearing barrel and fired his 9 mm pistol into the barrel.

Apparently not knowing where West's gun was aimed, Hamoody cracked and gave information about the planned ambush on West's convoy, thwarting the attack.

West said there were no further ambushes on U.S. forces in Taji until he was relieved of his leadership post on October 4.

"I know the method I used was not right, but I wanted to take care of my soldiers," West testified to a military courtroom of observers and some teary-eyed troops formerly under his command.

Asked if he would have act differently if under similar circumstances again, West testified, "If it's about the lives of my soldiers at stake, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/12/12/sprj.nirq.west.ruling/
 
Last edited:

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
Good man, indeed.

The successful prosecution of war requires a clarity as to who the enemy is, their motivations, the methodology they are willing and capable of employing and a determination to accept nothing short of victory over that enemy.

I don't doubt the military, serving or retired, are well aware of the enemy they face, why they face them and what must be done to successfully wage war. It is the politicians that I have grave doubts about.

West is not much different than any competent combat commander, except that he has taken those skills and attitudes into the political arena, where he absolutely stands out.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
West Sounds like a war mongering idiot to me, and no I don't like him and he can only make problems worse.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
He sounds like a social conservative to me. Yes, I needed to see more than a 3 minute response to a question to form some kind of opinion. From his website, seems he has a problem with sending $900 million to Hamas, but not $3 billion a year to Israel. He appears to be another "limited government" Republican who accepts "big government" in areas where he approves.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
Good man and a tea party fav - from 2003:

TIKRIT, Iraq (CNN) -- The commanding general of the 4th Infantry Division on Friday accepted a U.S. military investigator's recommendation and ordered administrative action against Lt. Col. Allen West, who was accused of using improper methods to force information out of an Iraqi detainee...

Following a military hearing, West was fined $5,000 over two months, according to West's civillian attorney, Neal Puck

The case stems from an incident August 20 at a military base in Taji, just north of Baghdad, when West was interrogating an Iraqi policeman, who was believed to have information about a plot to assassinate West with an ambush on a U.S. convoy...

West said he also threatened to kill Hamoody. Military prosecutors say West followed up on that threat by taking the suspect outside, put him on the ground near a weapons clearing barrel and fired his 9 mm pistol into the barrel.

Apparently not knowing where West's gun was aimed, Hamoody cracked and gave information about the planned ambush on West's convoy, thwarting the attack.

West said there were no further ambushes on U.S. forces in Taji until he was relieved of his leadership post on October 4.

"I know the method I used was not right, but I wanted to take care of my soldiers," West testified to a military courtroom of observers and some teary-eyed troops formerly under his command.

Asked if he would have act differently if under similar circumstances again, West testified, "If it's about the lives of my soldiers at stake, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/12/12/sprj.nirq.west.ruling/

Oh yeah I remember that incident! I didn't realize that this was the same guy! He scores even more points in my book for that. :awe:
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
He sounds like a social conservative to me. Yes, I needed to see more than a 3 minute response to a question to form some kind of opinion. From his website, seems he has a problem with sending $900 million to Hamas, but not $3 billion a year to Israel. He appears to be another "limited government" Republican who accepts "big government" in areas where he approves.

So not only do you try to paint a moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel, but then you try to say military aid to our allies is the same as big government welfare state spending? That's not a straw man, that's a straw tyrannosaurus rex.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
So not only do you try to paint a moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel, but then you try to say military aid to our allies is the same as big government welfare state spending? That's not a straw man, that's a straw tyrannosaurus rex.

The only difference is money spent on Israel has a better return on Dead Foreigners per Dollar.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Good man and a tea party fav - from 2003:

TIKRIT, Iraq (CNN) -- The commanding general of the 4th Infantry Division on Friday accepted a U.S. military investigator's recommendation and ordered administrative action against Lt. Col. Allen West, who was accused of using improper methods to force information out of an Iraqi detainee...

Following a military hearing, West was fined $5,000 over two months, according to West's civillian attorney, Neal Puck

The case stems from an incident August 20 at a military base in Taji, just north of Baghdad, when West was interrogating an Iraqi policeman, who was believed to have information about a plot to assassinate West with an ambush on a U.S. convoy...

West said he also threatened to kill Hamoody. Military prosecutors say West followed up on that threat by taking the suspect outside, put him on the ground near a weapons clearing barrel and fired his 9 mm pistol into the barrel.

Apparently not knowing where West's gun was aimed, Hamoody cracked and gave information about the planned ambush on West's convoy, thwarting the attack.

West said there were no further ambushes on U.S. forces in Taji until he was relieved of his leadership post on October 4.

"I know the method I used was not right, but I wanted to take care of my soldiers," West testified to a military courtroom of observers and some teary-eyed troops formerly under his command.

Asked if he would have act differently if under similar circumstances again, West testified, "If it's about the lives of my soldiers at stake, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/12/12/sprj.nirq.west.ruling/

wow. It's a shame that things have to come to this.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
The way he says it makes it easier to understand what the Israelis are going through.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
So not only do you try to paint a moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel, but then you try to say military aid to our allies is the same as big government welfare state spending? That's not a straw man, that's a straw tyrannosaurus rex.

The only straw man here is your first sentence.

There's nothing conservative, nothing "small government" about Neoconservatism, nor social conservatism.
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Great! Just what we need another ex military GOP chickenhawk :rolleyes:
Those types have worked out SOOOO well for us in the past :(
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
If his neoconservatism comes with a big dollop of social conservatism, he's never getting my vote.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
The only straw man here is your first sentence.

There's nothing conservative, nothing "small government" about Neoconservatism, nor social conservatism.

Defense and foreign policy decisions have little to do do with political parties directly, ever since the U.S. became the democratic world's sole guardian. Kenndy, Johnson, Carter, and Clinton all supported foreign military actions and aid. We can disagree about the merit of the position of America as the world's only superpower but that is a different topic of discussion.
 

Danube

Banned
Dec 10, 2009
613
0
0
I don't want another pro-war President! Please. Don't promote this Zionist asshole anymore.


I doubt Mr West takes war lightly. Reagan was made out to be a potential war monger too. Democrats and liberal Reps (Bush) are the chess board warriors.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Defense and foreign policy decisions have little to do do with political parties directly

You're correct, both main parties are war mongers when it suits them.

How about if we, gasp, use the military for national defense instead of attempting to police the world and force our views on everyone?