Originally posted by: MogulMonster
I TOLD you, you can't patent that. Men have been doing that since cave art came about.
Originally posted by: theNEOone
what does your process accomplish?
=|
I have a friend working in the patent office.. maybe I can convince him to post here
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: theNEOone
what does your process accomplish?
=|
It stops a degree of spam, accurately.
Originally posted by: MogulMonster
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: theNEOone
what does your process accomplish?
=|
It stops a degree of spam, accurately.
So, ATOT hasn't killed all of your brain. Great market to stick yourself into, BTW.
hmm, that's cool. my school does spam blocking/filtering based on hundreds of rules, assigns a weight to each of these rules, and then finally determines that likelihood that a particular e-mail is spam. if it's more than 50% likely that the e-mail is spam, it adds a tag to the beginning for the sujbect [PMX:###] to indicate that it's spam, with each "#" indicating an extra 10% probability that the e-mail is spam. (therefore, the above example indicates an 80% chance that the email is spam). then through outlook you can add a simple rule to filter out these e-mails based on percentage. i have really relaxed rules - i'm filtering at 50% probability. the rules are damn good, so far i get 100% spam blocking, and maybe 1-2% false positives. i can probably increase the outlook rules to filter out only 60-70, and i might get rid of the false positives, but it works so well that i think that i'll just leave it as it is.Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: theNEOone
what does your process accomplish?
=|
It stops a degree of spam, accurately.
Originally posted by: theNEOone
hmm, that's cool. my school does spam blocking/filtering based on hundreds of rules, assigns a weight to each of these rules, and then finally determines that likelihood that a particular e-mail is spam. if it's more than 50% likely that the e-mail is spam, it adds a tag to the beginning for the sujbect [PMX:###] to indicate that it's spam, with each "#" indicating an extra 10% probability that the e-mail is spam. (therefore, the above example indicates an 80% chance that the email is spam). then through outlook you can add a simple rule to filter out these e-mails based on percentage. i have really relaxed rules - i'm filtering at 50% probability. the rules are damn good, so far i get 100% spam blocking, and maybe 1-2% false positives. i can probably increase the outlook rules to filter out only 60-70, and i might get rid of the false positives, but it works so well that i think that i'll just leave it as it is.Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: theNEOone
what does your process accomplish?
=|
It stops a degree of spam, accurately.
here's some possible competition. my school uses PureMessage
=|
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
My dad got a patent. It cost about $6000 for a patent lawyer, although I have the feeling that he got pwned.
Originally posted by: Roger
No one can copy your invention/process for seven years without paying you royalties.
Depends on the kind of patent. Utility patents are good for 20, design patents for 14. After that they're public domain.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Depends on the kind of patent. Utility patents are good for 20, design patents for 14. After that they're public domain.
That doesn't seem to be true anymore.