• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I need a low power and small video card

hanscastorp

Junior Member
I recently bought this computer

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/ol...94514&cmpid=greatdeals

and have discovered that the integrated video card, ATI Radeon HD 3200 is insufficient for my needs. I would like to upgrade to a dedicated card, but the power supply is of a rather low wattage (300) and the motherboard and case are rather small.

Also, would there be many issues using an NVIDIA card on an ATI chipset?

Thanks
 
No, there wouldn't be any issues at all. How about a Radeon 4550? I believe it's passively cooled and needs no external power plug. It'd be alot faster than that IGC you got now.

You want nVidia than how about a 9500GT?🙂
 
Well it depends why the 3200 is insufficient. If it is because you want to play new games, then you better get a new power supply and something better than a 4350.

If it is for HD content.. then the 3200 should already be fast enough, it has hardware acceleration and HDMI.

 
I don't believe that I have a PCI-E 2.0 bus. Can I still use the 9500GT? Would I just get lower transfer speeds from CPU to GPU?

Also, are power supplies generally just one size? If I were to get another, could I be reasonably sure it would fit in my case? Also, I have a new 350 Watt PSU, would that make any difference on the quality of card I could get?
 
If you're looking to play games, you might want to state which games, what resolution, and which games you're looking into for the future.

Our suggestions are going to be completely different between a gaming computer and an office / Photoshop / HTPC machine.
 
I would recommend the 4670.

It's very fast for the price, requires NO additional power from the PSU and it's pretty small compared to other beefy cards like the 4850 and 4870. I'd stay away from the 9500GT. It's a DOG of a card and much slower than the 4670.

The 4670 is one of the lowest power using cards out there and would work in virtually any OEM machine like yours with a 250-350w PSU.

There don't seem to be any passive models available but the stock cooler on the reference card should be quiet enough unless you're gaming seriously and I don't think that the fan would drown out your speakers. 🙂

4670 prices should fall a bit in the coming weeks so you might want to wait until then to buy.

Whatever you do, don't get a 9500GT. It's SIGNIFICANTLY slower. Cheaper, yes, but you'd still be suffering from terrible performance in games.
 
I enjoy playing older games such as Medieval 2: Total War, Oblivion, Civilization 4, etcetera. Thanks for the input everyone, I suppose i'll order the ATI.
 
Originally posted by: hanscastorp
I enjoy playing older games such as Medieval 2: Total War, Oblivion, Civilization 4, etcetera. Thanks for the input everyone, I suppose i'll order the ATI.

Oh, the 4670 will walk all over those games. If you're gaming at 1280x1024, you can play pretty much anything out there with decent settings. Older games you can crank the goodies and get great fps.

I really think ATI designed this card for situations exactly like this.
 
Back
Top