Originally posted by: larciel
RAID 5 is so fcuking not worth it now..
Originally posted by: Kelemvor
Exactly why I have all my pictures synced up over 3 PCs. If one or two die, I still have the data.
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: larciel
RAID 5 is so fcuking not worth it now..
wtf?!
how do u lose data w/Raid5? unless 2 harddrives crash at same time?!
Originally posted by: xeemzor
Originally posted by: wetcat007
That's nothing, I got 1.4TB spread over 4 drives on one partition using LVM(don't do this it's a bad idea if one drive fails your screwed). Anyways it's not working out so great at the moment so I'm currently running fsck on it.... I need to get around to putting a RAID5(software not hardware) together![]()
Yea, well I have 80gb on my ipod.
Originally posted by: larciel
Originally posted by: skyking
Originally posted by: larciel
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Raid 5 is not supposed to do that to you, or is it Raid 1 I'm thinking of? Won't replacing the bad drive bring it all back, the parity drive is supposed to protect you, I thought.
I thought so, but when two HDDs go bad at the same time, you're SOL
yeah, that is the karmic bitch of raid 5. Who would think two drives would fail at once?
Yeah, I'm going to Raid 10. It also says ONE HDD failture per mirrorred set. There would be so little chance of that.