Originally posted by: CtK
i like tat song and she is so hot with tat phat ass of hers![]()
Originally posted by: lnguyen
the girl can sing man.
Let's agree to disagree then.Originally posted by: toekramp
Originally posted by: slydecix
The Ted Leo cover of it is awesome as well.
if by awesome you mean horrible and painful to listen to then yes. i totally agree with you
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: lnguyen
the girl can sing man.
pro tools can make anybody sing.
Originally posted by: Ranger X
Kelly and Clay are the only ones that really made a name for themselves after American Idol. Ruben is yesterday's garbage and Fantasia's talent can't make up for her physical appearance.
Originally posted by: vtqanh
The song "Behind those hazel eyes" is pretty good, too
it's aight, really.Originally posted by: HaxorNubcake
*turns in man card*
looks like I'll go back to listening.
Anyone with me?
I agree, the production on most of the AI songs I've heard are bland. Nothing as interesting as the singles off Britney or Justin's last album.Originally posted by: AMDZen
People who have the predominantly "accepted" great voice are very rarely interesting to me. I like voices that a lot of people would consider to be "bad" voices. Like kurt Kobain. Something with personality. Not just trying to sound the best, be original. Never has there been a singer on this ghey a$$ show who has interested me in the slightest.
Maybe if she went out and got a decent producer like Madonna did with William Orbit or like Brittney Spears did with "Slave 4 U" then I would like it. Its more about the music for me, a good voice and cheasy, typical production doesn't do it for me. No matter how good the voice is, the beat makes the track.
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
I didn't even know Kelly Clarkson was on "American Idol" but then again I have never watched that show. :Q
