• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I know this is stupid

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If this happens, nVidia tech paired with Intel's fabrication expertise is going to be hard to overcome -- if the integration goes smoothly. Of course, that's a big if with any merger of this size (including the AMD/ATI deal, of course).
 
Makes total sense for Nvidia. The room for an independent gpu maker is getting smaller and they need to expand somewhere. The market is shrinking (as a result of better integrated) and consolidating. Best to go gracefully.
 
to every one saying discrete graphic cards are dying just look at the thread about the 6150 IGP.
nvidia doesnot need intel. same for intel.

ps. from the article about the amd's and intel's fabrication plant methods seems to me amd has the better process and one ati can benifit more from. ofcourse i know nothing of this stuff so.......................
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Zebo
I'm predicting doom for ATI and AMD. Not only are thier products slower they don't have the processes tech to compete with INTELNV 65nm then 45nm... ATI will always be hotter and one step behind while NVIDIA get to take advantge of intels fabs.

As far as money it's chump change for intel. They could gut NV and run it into ground and it would not effet them.
Click to expand...

nonsense . . . 10 billion is not chump change for intel . . . if they DO gut nvidia and 'run it into the ground' it could signal their end 😛

i don't think it makes much sense for either Intel or nvidia . . . nvidia doesn't bring much to intel - for $10B - what is intel lacking? 😛

IF this really happens it could be the best possible news for AMD/ATi 😉
Click to expand...

Intel makes 10Billion in net profits in a single year!! Chump change relative to this:

AMD pays for 5.4 Billion (the price they paid for ATI) in 31.5 years. And that using AMD's best year of $165.5 million net profit in 2005.

And if you think AMD will continue to do that well please look at all thier years in the red.


 
Originally posted by: SexyK
If this happens, nVidia tech paired with Intel's fabrication expertise is going to be hard to overcome -- if the integration goes smoothly. Of course, that's a big if with any merger of this size (including the AMD/ATI deal, of course).
Click to expand...

It's not the expertrise so much as economies of scale. It's the same reason intel having 77% of the x86 market generates 99% of the profit.
 
Originally posted by: SexyK
If this happens, nVidia tech paired with Intel's fabrication expertise is going to be hard to overcome -- if the integration goes smoothly. Of course, that's a big if with any merger of this size (including the AMD/ATI deal, of course).
Click to expand...

It would be far from a merger. Intel is huge. NVIDIA would just become another product line. AMD had to take out a loan to buy ATI. Intel could buy NVIDIA out of their petty cash bin and NVIDIA is worth more than ATI.
 
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: SexyK
If this happens, nVidia tech paired with Intel's fabrication expertise is going to be hard to overcome -- if the integration goes smoothly. Of course, that's a big if with any merger of this size (including the AMD/ATI deal, of course).
Click to expand...

It would be far from a merger. Intel is huge. NVIDIA would just become another product line. AMD had to take out a loan to buy ATI. Intel could buy NVIDIA out of their petty cash bin and NVIDIA is worth more than ATI.
Click to expand...

If that's the case, then couldn't Intel purchase Nvidia AND AMD/ATI?

If someone went after them for antitrust they could just point at Matrox or perhaps IBM. 🙂
 
Would be nice, however Intel is huge by itself. Acquiring nVidia would take a huge amount of money compared to the AMD-ATI deal. Intel does have the money to purchase nVidia, but there is no guarentee it will ever merge. The most I can see is nVidia just becoming a subsidiary or something off to the side by itself. It's doubtful the government would even approve of a merger of the two considering intel+nvidia would be like a massive monopoly more than it is now.
 
Originally posted by: vhx
Would be nice, however Intel is huge by itself. Acquiring nVidia would take a huge amount of money compared to the AMD-ATI deal. Intel does have the money to purchase nVidia, but there is no guarentee it will ever merge. The most I can see is nVidia just becoming a subsidiary or something off to the side by itself. It's doubtful the government would even approve of a merger of the two considering intel+nvidia would be like a massive monopoly more than it is now.
Click to expand...

They will allow the merger, Intel would cry foul at the ATi/AMD merger.
 
Originally posted by: vhx
Would be nice, however Intel is huge by itself. Acquiring nVidia would take a huge amount of money compared to the AMD-ATI deal. Intel does have the money to purchase nVidia, but there is no guarentee it will ever merge. The most I can see is nVidia just becoming a subsidiary or something off to the side by itself. It's doubtful the government would even approve of a merger of the two considering intel+nvidia would be like a massive monopoly more than it is now.
Click to expand...

They have more than enough money to pour into the right pockets and let them "forget" nicely about any type of monopoly!
 
well intel-nvidia vs AMD-ATI should be interesting if it ever happens.
The prospect is interesting but intel would have to deal with a lot of issues such as anti-trust,market monopoly etc....
Frankly i would have been happy if all of them were left as they were,i.e seperately.As in no AMD-ATI merger.
Oh well,anything can happen.
 
Here is an interesting question: In the graphics card market, nVidia has always been regarded as better than ATI when it comes to Linux support. Yet, ATI has always been more linux-friendly than Intel. I wonder which company will wind up with better Linux support?

Why couldn't AMD buy nVidia, and then let Intel have ATI? That way, my choice of hardware for running Linux would be much easier.
 
Originally posted by: Zebo
I'm predicting doom for ATI and AMD. Not only are thier products slower they don't have the processes tech to compete with INTELNV 65nm then 45nm... ATI will always be hotter and one step behind while NVIDIA get to take advantge of intels fabs.

As far as money it's chump change for intel. They could gut NV and run it into ground and it would not effet them.
Click to expand...

IBM
 
OMG! Well, I'd be nicer if companies stayed seperate, but I can't say teaming up with Intel would be a bad thing for NVidia - it might hopefully mean better quality products that don't crash like the dodgy 7900's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top