I just realized that absolute power doesn't corrupt.

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
In the first place. of course, absolute power doesn't exist but let's just leave that aside. This issue I just saw is that power is a coin side of fear. We want control because we are afraid of the random reality of our fate, that we have no real control at all. So the lust for power is actually the presence of fear, and we create what we fear. The desire for power and the abuse of power will happen because the folk who seek it are mentally ill. Absolute power corrupts because those who seek it have already been corrupted. That is why Hobbits can carry the ring. They have no ego.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Oh ya the world is just full of dictators and rulers that do nothing but what is best for their people. They make sure before they build mulit-million dollar mansions that all the people in their country are clothed, fed, have safe drinking water and are safe. We hear about it all the time....
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
Man's base nature is corrupt -- completely self-centered. We learn to be nice when selfish acts collide -- we learn that we are not the center of the universe when someone else keeps a boon for themselves. Their power to withhold what we want means we have to manipulate people into not withholding in order to get what we want. As we can withhold, we have something to bargain with. We eventually come to an idea of fairness -- equitable trade -- and thus a social contract is made.

With absolute power you can dismantle this, as your power renders the objections of others meaningless. If there are no negative repercussions for acting self-centered, being nice is nothing but a waste of time and energy.

Now, as you said, absolute power doesn't exist, so there's always someone it's in your interest to cater to to some degree, but the hierarchy can be pretty steep so you may not have to cater to those they cater to.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
That is why Hobbits can carry the ring. They have no ego.
You really need to read Tolkein again because you apparently didn't comprehend it at all. It wasn't that any Hobbit could carry the ring. Frodo was chosen to carry the ring; not specifically because he was a Hobbit but because he was Frodo, who happened to be a Hobbit.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
You really need to read Tolkein again because you apparently didn't comprehend it at all. It wasn't that any Hobbit could carry the ring. Frodo was chosen to carry the ring; not specifically because he was a Hobbit but because he was Frodo, who happened to be a Hobbit.

How does one determine the degree of relationship between who one is and what one is?
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
In the first place. of course, absolute power doesn't exist but let's just leave that aside. This issue I just saw is that power is a coin side of fear. We want control because we are afraid of the random reality of our fate, that we have no real control at all. So the lust for power is actually the presence of fear, and we create what we fear. The desire for power and the abuse of power will happen because the folk who seek it are mentally ill. Absolute power corrupts because those who seek it have already been corrupted. That is why Hobbits can carry the ring. They have no ego.

Well, when hobbits arrive we can try elevating them to absolute power and see what happens.

In the meantime, human nature trumps even the most disciplined.
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
The desire for power and the abuse of power will happen because the folk who seek it are mentally ill.

Not sure where the Hobbit thing really applied to this, but I have noticed the truth behind the statement I quoted and it is VERY noticeable.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Maybe the ring loved the world and wanted to be destroyed???

In War we have seen quite often how one man will risk his life to save his comrades. When faced with evil, man is capable of great acts of selflessness. Kind of like that hero that jumped out of a helocopter into the east river near washington DC, to save drowning people. People often raise to the challenge in times of great need.
 
Last edited:

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
Yeah. I don't see how its avoidable though. We want to live comfortably and safely in a world that is largely neither comfortable or safe without being changed to suit us. Exerting control. over our environment is one of our greatest assets. Without leadership much of what we have would not possible simply because a bunch of anarchists would never organize well enough to do it. It easy to take the world we live in for granted. Don't assume you can stay in the treetops without the trunk to support you, regardless of how ugly you think that trunk is. Its the very thing that has lifted you far enough above poverty to have enough spare time to grow to despise it.
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,794
568
126
Or has someone else has stated
Absolute power does not corrupt absolutely. Absolute power attracts the corruptible.

You don't necessarily have to be mentally ill to pursue it but it probably helps quite a bit.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
The degree power corrupts is proportional to the amount of control involved and inversely proportional to the disinterest in having ones will forced on others. Frodo withstood as long as he did because the Ring was thrust upon him, not to use, but to safeguard from use. He himself wanted no part of it or what it could do. In fact he despised it, and therefore did what greater beings could not.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
Should one try to make such a determination? It seems to me that's how prejudice is born.

Seems to me it's how it's prevented. I just asked how you did it here. You said he was chosen not as a Hobbit but for who he was. Somebody did it according to you so I just wonder how.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
The degree power corrupts is proportional to the amount of control involved and inversely proportional to the disinterest in having ones will forced on others. Frodo withstood as long as he did because the Ring was thrust upon him, not to use, but to safeguard from use. He himself wanted no part of it or what it could do. In fact he despised it, and therefore did what greater beings could not.

Why do you suppose he despised it?
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Why do you suppose he despised it?

The short answer is that he had the wisdom to see that both good and evil are a duality we possess, and that good is the better of the two. Giving aid to the dark side we all must come to terms with in the form of ego speaking justifications of tyranny for the greater good was an evil itself. That was why Gandalf refused it, because he would be corrupted in his despite to do good. Frodo's sense of self was that of someone small and with no great purpose. That meekness was his strength.

Something from Lincoln to consider:

“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.”
 

spittledip

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2005
4,480
1
81
No one was unable to control the power of the ring. Frodo was unable to let go of the power- it had to be taken from him by force.

If we were to merge the actual story of LOTR and the OP's original point, then we could come up with the conclusion that all are ultimately corruptible no matter who they are. That is, only if you take Frodo to be the epitome of restraint and humility as far as it is possible for humanoids. That stated, we could also suggest that mental illness, if it is actually a piece of the "corruptible by power" puzzle, is something that we all suffer from to a degree. Mental illness is something that is suggested to be on a sliding scale rather than "all or nothing," so this would fit.

I believe in equal opportunity when it comes to corruption :D
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
The author did that, not me.

Yes, I know but you said, "You really need to read Tolkein again because you apparently didn't comprehend it at all. It wasn't that any Hobbit could carry the ring. Frodo was chosen to carry the ring; not specifically because he was a Hobbit but because he was Frodo, who happened to be a Hobbit."

Naturally, when you said I didn't comprehend why Frodo was chosen that maybe you did.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
No one was unable to control the power of the ring. Frodo was unable to let go of the power- it had to be taken from him by force.

If we were to merge the actual story of LOTR and the OP's original point, then we could come up with the conclusion that all are ultimately corruptible no matter who they are. That is, only if you take Frodo to be the epitome of restraint and humility as far as it is possible for humanoids. That stated, we could also suggest that mental illness, if it is actually a piece of the "corruptible by power" puzzle, is something that we all suffer from to a degree. Mental illness is something that is suggested to be on a sliding scale rather than "all or nothing," so this would fit.

I believe in equal opportunity when it comes to corruption :D

Yes, this is what I believe is how the story went, that Frodo couldn't let go by his own will and needed help. This, I believe, is the Christian view of things, and one with which I Partially disagree. The religious view is that man is sinful and in need of redemption and that we carry original sin to make this notion appear to make sense. This is a very deep philosophical issue, but I believe we were all born perfect. Thus I believe our natural state is to have no interest in the ring and that is a state which we can return to. I believe that belief in the absolute power of power to corrupt is pessimism and surrender to self hate.