I just realized if I lived in Ohio the Republicans wanted to keep me from voting.

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
D'uh. It was so long ago I had almost forgotten.
About 30 years ago when I lived in New York I lost my wallet with my drivers license.
I got a replacement license pretty quickly. However, about three months later I started to get notices my license was suspended. I went to the motor vehichle office which sent me to the courthouse. The courthouse said I had run red lights, gone down a one way street the wrong way, and few other citations. However, I could only see the judge on the day of my court case. Which they told me had been mailed to me. This went on for like 2 months.
Finally I called my State Assemblyman and he called the Motor Vehichle and this was what I found out.
Someone had been using my license. And the court was sending the trial notifications to his address and the suspension notifications to me.
The end result of this was that the Motor Vehicle tried to fix my license and couldn't. Instead they issued me a new license with a new i.d. number. However, my insurance company would not renew my insurance because the tickets kept showing on my license. Turns out, at least in New York, you drivers license number is made up of numbers and letters that are codes for things like your sex, and your name. Since a new license for me would have had the exact same number they added a "tie breaker" of 001 to the end of drivers license number. But the insurance companies did not have enough fields to enter any more digits than the standard number.
So the motor vehicle said they would drop my middle initial from my new license and therefore I would have a new i.d. number.
Now I live in another state and can once again use my middle initial.
BUT if I lived in Ohio and registered to vote using my full name, it would have conflicted with my lack of initial on my drivers license, and the Republicans wanted me kicked off the voter list.

Funny how I didn't think how this could have applied to me.
But it would have.
 

midway

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
301
0
0
The fewer people vote the more power they have. Hell, they publicly espouse this viewpoint.

"I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of the people. They never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, founder of the Heritage Foundation
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: yllus
Useless. Utterly useless.

Self-referential post. Our laws should be based on the principle of ensuring voters get to vote, not on looking for ways to suppress voting.

I've yet to see one so-called conservative in these forums post, that I recall, condemning any o the outrageous voter suppression committed by some Republicans.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Maybe you don't realize but for that wall of words to be read by people, it would have to describe naked women and have impending blow jobs every few sentences.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Can't you vote with a passport or several types of identification cards? You accept defeat too easily.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: midway
The fewer people vote the more power they have. Hell, they publicly espouse this viewpoint.

"I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of the people. They never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, founder of the Heritage Foundation

So what? No one's for more people voting; people are just for more like-minded people voting. Answer this honestly: There are thousands of hard-core Republicans who (still) think GWB is doing a wonderful job, but probably won't vote because McCain doesn't excite them. Does this bother you in the least?
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: midway
The fewer people vote the more power they have. Hell, they publicly espouse this viewpoint.

"I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of the people. They never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, founder of the Heritage Foundation

So what? No one's for more people voting; people are just for more like-minded people voting. Answer this honestly: There are thousands of hard-core Republicans who (still) think GWB is doing a wonderful job, but probably won't vote because McCain doesn't excite them. Does this bother you in the least?


Obama will have them shot by noon on January 22, 2009, so the issue is moot. Drain that cesspool, Barack Baby! :)

-Robert
 

herkulease

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2001
3,923
0
0
If you lived in Ohio long enough to vote wouldn't you also have an Ohio state driver's license that would have your full name? Why would you keep your NY license?
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: herkulease
If you lived in Ohio long enough to vote wouldn't you also have an Ohio state driver's license that would have your full name? Why would you keep your NY license?

Then it would not have made a story

 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: herkulease
If you lived in Ohio long enough to vote wouldn't you also have an Ohio state driver's license that would have your full name? Why would you keep your NY license?

Then it would not have made a story

STORY being the key here.