You do realize you're arguing with a fascist supporter who claims that there aren't any fascists? Like, you're totally wasting your time here. There's nothing to be learned, no minds to change, no reason to share with someone. Apologies will be issued, goalposts will be moved, and regardless of the outcome, new apologies will be made for the next fascist.
And end running around the constitution by reinterpreting it is totally off the table?
Yeah. I like talking to people I don't agree with.
They don't disagree with you, they want you to die and don't have the integrity to say it for numerous reasons.
Yeah but they are going to want that if I talk to them or not!
You aren't speaking with someone who has 278 posts and is here to have an honest conversation. You can see their account creation date and post count, right?
Because...Harris was black, Indian, and female.
And I wanna fuck Angie Dickinson. Let's see who gets lucky first.
He can just run for Prime Minster and win with 97% of the vote
Well...she's 93 years old...so she probably can't fight back very well...
He never has to run again...remember?
Hence why I'm so furious at the establishment Democrats who forced Kamala on us and lost us the republic. The Dear Leader is above the law and anyone who thinks he isn't using that power is nuts.He never has to run again...remember?
User Clip: Trump: "In four years, You don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good. You're not going to have to vote."
Trump: "In four years, You don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good. You're not going to have to vote."www.c-span.org
The rule is pretty clear "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". There isn't any wiggle room in that sentence. It's a simple declarative statement. That leaves only one avenue for reelection, change the constitution. He'd have to be an extremely successful president for that to happen, I don't think he'll make that grade.
The 14th is pretty clear about birthright citizens but he's started the ball rolling on that!
With the fascist majority on the Supreme Court willing to lie about everything, the amendment is what the fascists want it to be. The emolument clause of the Constitution is every bit as clear as the text above and the Supremes ruled that it doesn't say what it clearly says.
Of course he could simply have anyone who argued he couldn't become president again killed and that would be 100% legal. (or at least he would be immune from any sanction for doing it)
Not here to kink shame but you do realize people age in real life right and don't stay looking like their movies from the 50s and 60s right?
It's a line from the Sopranos and Junior means it as a compliment to her.
Indeed.
And if it does happen, he'll shrug and say "I don't agree with that, he shouldn't have done it", and that will be about the extent of his protestations.
I was going to say, shit you must be older than me, I got over that thing a decade ago.
The courts decision in that case was to wipe away the lower courts ruling without any further action. That was done without comment or dissent. None of the justices chose to say anything about it.
We agree that the plain meaning of the emoluments clause clearly prohibited Trump taking personal gifts from other countries and he did it anyway. Does it really matter if they did nothing about it?
