Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Tell us why you feel it is unconstitutional.
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Tell us why you feel it is unconstitutional.
breach of civil liberties?
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Tell us why you feel it is unconstitutional.
breach of civil liberties?
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Originally posted by: Legendary
So you're referring to DHS or ICE officers?
Generally those guys won't show up at your door without reason. But I doubt a warrantless search of your home would be admissible evidence in that case.
Originally posted by: txrandom
The constitution protects you from unreasonable search and seizure not unreasonable search or seizure.
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: txrandom
The constitution protects you from unreasonable search and seizure not unreasonable search or seizure.
😕
Originally posted by: spidey07
If they see a crime being committed then sure, otherwise warrant is needed and not hard to get.
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Tell us why you feel it is unconstitutional.
breach of civil liberties?
Originally posted by: Xylitol
on "suspicion" of you being a terrorist without a search warrant or anything. If this is true, why are there so many stupid judges out there who refuse to declare this unconstitutional???
so is this true?
(By officer - i don't mean any ordinary police officer)
Originally posted by: manowar821
Yeah, they "can". This doesn't mean you shouldn't attack them for invading your home, though. Just because there's a bullshit act, doesn't mean it's okay for them to abuse our human rights. We deserve better than that.
Personally, I have a better chance of being assaulted and killed by fascists in cops clothing than by terrorists from the middle east. It's not okay, no matter how many acts are signed by worthless dog presidents.