Jaepheth
Platinum Member
- Apr 29, 2006
- 2,572
- 25
- 91
Do not judge the message by the messenger.
You think I'm a Hindu Nazi, don't you?
I can disagree and agree with you a thousand ways on this any day.
But that's not the point here in this thread, my dear.
You agree Godel's is speaking the truth and by extension of his theorem, my hypothesis is true?
I don't think anyone here believes you're a Hindu Nazi...
Delusional Sophist on the other hand...
Look, you can't take any math theorem you want and apply it to the real world. Otherwise, I could solve world hunger with a melon and a sharp enough knife thanks to the Banach-Tarski paradox. Rigorous math theorems are based on concrete assumptions that are all known and well defined. Our understanding of the real world is based on hypothesis derived from observational data. It would be faulty to use these hypothesis the same way a mathematician uses axioms and then to use the results as any sort of absolute truth.
Also, I don't think you actually posed any sort of hypothesis. You just said you think the universe is bigger than we can observe (which light cones are sufficient proof of this) and then linked to an article whose only relation to your claim was that they sort of both deal with what we can and can't "know". In other words, unless you care to propose an experiment by which we can test your hypothesis; you're essentially just espousing an opinion that has no actual bearing on anyone's life in any way except to take up space on an internet forum. Space that would be better put to use storing pictures of an irreverent or lascivious nature.
