Respect goes both ways.
If the uncle objects to his sons sexual preference, so be it.
If the nephew objects to the uncles opinion, then so be it.
It is not the place of one or the other to try and force their viewpoints on the other party.
Is if there's violence, bigotry and ignorance involved then it's the responsibility of every right thinking, caring, person to educate and emancipate.Last I heard, murder was a crime.
Why is it ok to confront the uncle, but its not ok for the uncle to have an opinion that is different from the nephew?
Respect goes both ways.
If the uncle objects to his sons black-woman preference, so be it.
If the nephew objects to the racist-ignorance, then so be it.
It is not the place of one or the other to try and force their viewpoints on the other party.
Is if there's violence, bigotry and ignorance involved then it's the responsibility of every right thinking, caring, person to educate and emancipate.
that's why you've got to land a guy by your mid 30's before your body starts falling apartI've seen lots of larger gay couples. But they were older.
ftfyAlso: "All that is necessary for the gay to triumph is that good men do nothing."
Is if there's violence, bigotry and ignorance involved then it's the responsibility of every right thinking, caring, person to educate and emancipate.
By not respecting the uncles opinion, you are promoting bigotry.
Who in society gets to define what is right, what is wrong, and what is socially acceptable?
It is unfathomable to me that you would suggest that the OP must respect domestic violence as an appropriate response to his cousin's sexuality.
There is a difference between talking and doing.
Also, we are talking about a 15 or 16 year old young man, not a 2 month old infant.
When it comes to family problems, its best to keep your nose out. And that includes extended family members.
It's easier to accept some things when they are not choices.How is that even relevant? Whether it is a choice or not doesn't matter.
-KeithP
Oh, so potential abuse of a 15-16 year old is ok then?
There is a difference between talking and doing.
Also, we are talking about a 15 or 16 year old young man, not a 2 month old infant.
When it comes to family problems, its best to keep your nose out. And that includes extended family members.
If it were my uncle, I would be getting involved in this.
Do you have any teenage children?
The stat is a little misleading, as it compares gay kids with hostile family to straight kids. I'll try to replace this with a better stat.LGBT youth whose families are hostile are eight times likelier to commit suicide than their straight peers. Hostile parents can't make their gay kids straight, but they can make them dead.
Aspects of family dynamics—such as lack of support, conflict, and rejection as well as connectedness —play an important role in suicide risk for LGB youth. Abuse within the family (whether psychological, verbal, physical, or sexual) elevates the risk of suicidal behavior by LGB young people (Gibson & Saunders, 1994; McBee-Strayer & Rogers, 2002). Forty percent of the callers to the Trevor Helpline for LGBTQ youth reported that they had difficulty with their families because of their sexual orientation (Charles Robbins, personal communication, April 9, 2008). Family conflict is also a contributing factor to homelessness of LGBT youth, discussed below.
Family support plays an important role for LGB youth during the period in which they identify and “come out,” or disclose their sexual orientation to their families. LGB youth experience a rise in suicide attempts and ideation around the time of disclosure (D’Augelli & Hershberger, 1993; Igartua et al., 2003; Remafedi et al., 1991). D’Augelli, Hershberger, & Pilkington (1998) found that LGB youth who had disclosed to their families were more than four times as likely to have attempted suicide as LGB youth who had not disclosed. Researchers speculate that this is related to the stress caused by coming out and fear of—or actual—rejection by members of their families. A substantial proportion of youth who disclose an LGB sexual orientation to their families are assaulted by members of their family, while many others are threatened or verbally and emotionally abused (D'Augelli et al., 1998).
Research findings generally agree that family and parental support are important protective factors against adolescent suicide for LGB youth (Kidd et al., 2006; Proctor & Groze, 1994). Eisenberg and Resnick (2006) measured protective factors—specifically, family connectedness, other adult caring, and school safety—based on youth self-reports. They found that lower levels of these protective factors in LGB youth account for much of the increased risk of suicidal ideation and attempts. In particular, family connectedness plays a vital role for LGB youth: those with strong family connectedness are half as likely to experience suicidal ideation as those with low family connectedness. They concluded:
Family connectedness, support from other adults, and school safety are all characteristics that are amenable to change, and would be appropriate targets for interventions aimed at protecting young people from self-harm. Improving the ability of parents and other influential adults to connect with and support adolescents grappling with issues of sexual identity may be a critical component of mental health promotion and protection for these young people (p. 667).
No, but,,,,
Keep in mind parents have the right to discipline their children. The parents sees the son making poor choices, the parent therefor has the right to discipline the child.
The level and degree of discipline depends on a lot of factors, age being one of them. A parent would not discipline a 3 year old like they would a 13 year old.
No, it is not ok.
But as far as we know, no violence has occurred yet.
It appears to me that the venting of a disappointed father has been turned into nothing but speculation.
EDIT
Keep in mind parents have the right to discipline their children. The parents sees the son making poor choices, the parent therefor has the right to discipline the child.
The level and degree of discipline depends on a lot of factors, age being one of them. A parent would not discipline a 3 year old like they would a 13 year old.
Keep in mind parents have the right to discipline their children. The parents sees the son making poor choices, the parent therefor has the right to discipline the child.
A parent would not discipline a 3 year old like they would a 13 year old.
That is utterly absurd. You are a disgusting pathetic bigot. :thumbsdown:
and you do not beat the shit out of the child. that is not discipline.
Who are you to decide how a parent should discipline their child?
There is a difference between a child and a young adult.
We are not talking about a 3, 4 or 5 year old child here. We are talking about a 15 or 16 young adult.
You use the word "force," interesting. Here it's a question of the uncle using violence, which is certainly a form of force. However, just expressing a feeling without force, what the OP is morally obligated to do, is not forceful at all, it's simply a matter of not loaning complicity by virtue of silence. Can't you see that?Last I heard, murder was a crime.
Why is it ok to confront the uncle, but its not ok for the uncle to have an opinion that is different from the nephew?
Respect goes both ways.
If the uncle objects to his sons sexual preference, so be it.
If the nephew objects to the uncles opinion, then so be it.
It is not the place of one or the other to try and force their viewpoints on the other party.
Who are you to decide how a parent should discipline their child?