Originally posted by: inspire
Originally posted by: jbourne77
I'm in a similar situation, OP. My boss micromanages as if no one beneath him has the mental capacity to tie their shoes. He's always done it to a small extent, but he gets so passionate about his ideas that he has to supervise every little detail every little step of the way. The problem is that his ideas are only from his perspective, and he routinely neglects to evaluate our CUSTOMERS' perspectives, so his ideas typically fail.
It's a vicious cycle. The more his ideas fail, the more he's convinced it's because they weren't implemented properly, and thus the more he micromanages.
I don't give a fsck anymore, personally. I'm paid either way.
The cycle - you absolutely nailed it. The clincher in my case was interesting. Let me explain. I work for an office that had to send all of its files to get decontaminated after it flooded during Hurricane Katrina. Unfortunately, the office had only paper files - no computer files whatsoever of our records.
So, when I got hired, my goal was to have a fully functional database implented. Ambitious, considering the minimum qualifications for the job included only a GED. So, I develop the idea, write up a proposal and some purchase requisitions, and I'm ready to go. Boss decides we have to 'streamline' things. Basically, I only need to index our current files, rather than having complete information. This is because the boss doesn't like having to learn to use the software. She'd rather use Excel than Access. Regardless, she thinks this is a waste of time.
Eventually, the boss's bosses want to see some more progress (long story, the office is severely disorganized and we're missing all kinds of stuff), so the boss promises a plan. Unfortunately, the implementation of said plan requires a more complete database. Oops. Except. That's my fault all of a sudden. Well, a couple of e-mails to the boss's boss and meetings later, with the boss claiming she never knew I didn't have that information in the DB, even after she specifically told me not to put it there, we just agree to deal with the situation.
Good deal, because it was getting blamed on me with the boss claiming ignorance.
Cliffs:
- I want to make comprehensive Database
- Boss doesn't think it's important and makes me 'streamline' the process (cut it short)
- Boss later needs the very info she had me exclude from the DB
- Boss tries to claim ignorance and blame it on me
- Boss get owned when I e-mail her boss