I had an eargasm today

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Don't know about those particular MLs nor the setup, but I loved classical on some planers I once owned (ribbons) -- actually, it was the soundstage (in addition to the ultra-clear/smooth high end) I heard from them when playing classical that made me say "I'll take them". They didn't do so hot on rock or jazz though -- in fact I blew an amp trying to make them bop once. I liked the power balance of full range bipolars enough to stick with them pretty much afterwards, even preferring that with a reduction of the ultra-clear highs.

IMO, bottom end audiophilia starts when you pay attention to acoustics, and start arranging your equipment according to how it sounds. I never got into 5.1 because I had a hard enough time getting 2.0 done right, and never the space / layout to try surround. And it was just fine. So if classical didn't sound good, I'd drop 3.1, change the layout, and maybe even upgrade the drivers in the same line before I gave up.

Also there's a saying about some equipment being too revealing.. if those speakers were as good as they might have been, then perhaps they were showing problems upstream. That's not hard to imagine; Best Buy's doing great going this far -- perhaps they have a bit more to do.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
10
81
Originally posted by: spikespiegal
they sound like pure ass. I'm not sure if it's a limitation of the electrostatic technology, but everything sounds muddy and just not impressive at all.

The achilles heel of planar technology is they lack mass, and lack of mass means a lack of dynamics.
Can you explain?