I guess you're all as meh about the OnePlus 2 too

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
yea the invite system is aids

Yes, you wonder why they offer a cheap phones through invitations when in fact all people want is a more expensive phone where you pay for an expensive marketing campaign and huge stocking fees. This invite system is a pain in the ass. It makes phones cost too little. I'd rather buy a phone where I know I know I pay for the brand's advertising, rather than spend 1 minute sharing the reservation list with friends on social media. Asking 1 min of my time to save me only 200-300 USD is just outrageous.
I wish evangellst marketing strategies had never been invented.

You know the world goes downhill when big brands are not able to get richer anymore. I'd rather make a large corporation richer through buying their overpriced phones than support some fair game player who refuse the status quo that I feel so comfortable with. Who is Oneplus anyways to even consider single handedly challenging the greed of the big players and their higher margins? They should go back to where they come from and not propose an alternative business model. This is only driving prices down and as a customer I demand to be allowed to pay more. How else am I supposed to spend my fucking money! Fuck OnePlus and their clever marketing!
 

sbpromania

Senior member
Mar 3, 2015
265
1
16
www.sbp-romania.com
The OnePlus One was awesome, almost too good to be true. The second version has many lacks:
- no CM
- no microSD
- no removable battery
The Apple trend seems to be making many victims...
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
You made me log in...I can't let you say that. Most brands have had quality assurance issues - just think back. HTC M7 gap issue? Apple antenna issue?Bend gate?

xda forums is littered with early batch issues for most brands. Beating on the small because they provide a similar experience as a lower price is just wrong.

Yeah but with all of those brands you don't have to ship the phone internationally in order to take advantage of the warranty if you get a dud. OnePlus you do.

Amongst the 2015 crop of smartphones it is the only one not penalized by average battery capacity or QHD.

Except that the LG 2015 Nexus 5 should have a decent battery size, your wanted 1080p screen, plus some stuff OnePlus doesn't include like Qi charging, NFC and a non-broken USB 3.1 port (OnePlus's doesn't Quickcharge or run above 2.0 speeds).

It is not like there is much choice apart from 14nm Samsung phones this year. And the QC2.0 debacle has cooled me off.

When then that 810 SoC in the OnePlus 2 should heat you right back up! :)

The Moto X Style is not really an option in Europe (500 EUR) but even if it were I would hate myself of sacrificing battery life for QHD when I could have bought a device with S820 in the next 4-6 couple of months and have 20% improved power efficiency.

Hopefully when the 820 comes it is a big enough leap to finally move us past the terrible 810 in a significant way.

Yes, you wonder why they offer a cheap phones through invitations when in fact all people want is a more expensive phone where you pay for an expensive marketing campaign and huge stocking fees. This invite system is a pain in the ass. It makes phones cost too little. I'd rather buy a phone where I know I know I pay for the brand's advertising, rather than spend 1 minute sharing the reservation list with friends on social media. Asking 1 min of my time to save me only 200-300 USD is just outrageous.

This isn't 2014 anymore. Sure LAST YEAR the OnePlus alone gave us high-end specs at that price point, and given the large and expensive Nexus (aka the usual nerd phone) it gave OnePlus a big window.

In 2015 we expect a more competitive Nexus, Moto has lowered their phone price, and companies like Asus are putting out high value device like the ZenFone 2 without a stupid invite system.

The invite system was fine last year, but not this year. Apparently the OnePlus 1 was a success, so its time for that company to quit the crap, stick out their neck and take some loans to have a stock on hand and a non-invite purchase system like anyone else. In my opinion of course, but the reality is that market doesn't care WHY One Plus does the invite system or how it saves them money. We care about our experience as a consumer, and begging for invites sucks for that experience.

Who is Oneplus anyways to even consider single handedly challenging the greed of the big players and their higher margins?

First of all they aren't the only one challenging higher margins, every major Chinese phone maker is. And those companies also want to break into the American market, that is the reason Huawei is making a Nexus.

Secondly we have a very good idea who OnePlus is even though they HATE HATE HATE journalists digging into it. It is pretty obvious that they share key investors with Oppo, they use Oppo capacity, and they are closely tied to that company. I wouldn't be surprised if OnePlus may still turn out to be Oppo’s version of Toyota’s Scion.

I appreciate the way they smashed the market last year and caused real disruption, but the times have moved on. Now they are the ones acting all arrogant, saying people don't really use things like Qi Charging or NFC simply because their device doesn't have it. It only took them a cycle to forget their humble roots.

Fuck OnePlus and their clever marketing!

You must be kidding me right? Their marketing is terrible. I listen to the All About Android podcast on Twit and they have a "How Many Days Until a OnePlus Marketing Blunder?" segment like factories have a safety sign.

There was the terrible “Smash the Past” contest, the "Ladies First" contest which even they admit was a "a very misguided effort," the fallout with CM, and now OnePlus’s failure to meet their launch for the OnePlus 2 in North America delayed all shipments even if you have a precious invite. One Plus's marketing and invite system is amateur hour, and either they grow up quickly and start selling the device like a normal company on their website or they are going to miss their window and get boat raced by Chinese companies entering the market. In my opinion of course.
 
Last edited:

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
Just so we're clear, it's not a broken 3.1 port. It's a USB 2.0 port with a Type-C connector.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Just so we're clear, it's not a broken 3.1 port. It's a USB 2.0 port with a Type-C connector.

Thank you for the clarification. Good call.

I will still consider it broken because every other modern 2.0 phone has quickcharge.
 
Last edited:

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
Yeah but with all of those brands you don't have to ship the phone internationally in order to take advantage of the warranty if you get a dud. OnePlus you do.



Except that the LG 2015 Nexus 5 should have a decent battery size, your wanted 1080p screen, plus some stuff OnePlus doesn't include like Qi charging, NFC and a non-broken USB 3.1 port (OnePlus's doesn't Quickcharge or run above 2.0 speeds).



When then that 810 SoC in the OnePlus 2 should heat you right back up! :)



Hopefully when the 820 comes it is a big enough leap to finally move us past the terrible 810 in a significant way.



This isn't 2014 anymore. Sure LAST YEAR the OnePlus alone gave us high-end specs at that price point, and given the large and expensive Nexus (aka the usual nerd phone) it gave OnePlus a big window.

In 2015 we expect a more competitive Nexus, Moto has lowered their phone price, and companies like Asus are putting out high value device like the ZenFone 2 without a stupid invite system.

The invite system was fine last year, but not this year. Apparently the OnePlus 1 was a success, so its time for that company to quit the crap, stick out their neck and take some loans to have a stock on hand and a non-invite purchase system like anyone else. In my opinion of course, but the reality is that market doesn't care WHY One Plus does the invite system or how it saves them money. We care about our experience as a consumer, and begging for invites sucks for that experience.



First of all they aren't the only one challenging higher margins, every major Chinese phone maker is. And those companies also want to break into the American market, that is the reason Huawei is making a Nexus.

Secondly we have a very good idea who OnePlus is even though they HATE HATE HATE journalists digging into it. It is pretty obvious that they share key investors with Oppo, they use Oppo capacity, and they are closely tied to that company. I wouldn't be surprised if OnePlus may still turn out to be Oppo’s version of Toyota’s Scion.

I appreciate the way they smashed the market last year and caused real disruption, but the times have moved on. Now they are the ones acting all arrogant, saying people don't really use things like Qi Charging or NFC simply because their device doesn't have it. It only took them a cycle to forget their humble roots.



You must be kidding me right? Their marketing is terrible. I listen to the All About Android podcast on Twit and they have a "How Many Days Until a OnePlus Marketing Blunder?" segment like factories have a safety sign.

There was the terrible “Smash the Past” contest, the "Ladies First" contest which even they admit was a "a very misguided effort," the fallout with CM, and now OnePlus’s failure to meet their launch for the OnePlus 2 in North America delayed all shipments even if you have a precious invite. One Plus's marketing and invite system is amateur hour, and either they grow up quickly and start selling the device like a normal company on their website or they are going to miss their window and get boat raced by Chinese companies entering the market. In my opinion of course.

1. Warranty shipping
Fair enough, as long as the issue is not overblown. I had yellow tint on my device and it disappeared.

2.Nexus 5
Would have my interest if it weren't for the following issues (big no no for me):
  • 2700mAh (not sure if confirmed but that would be a bummer)
  • 5.2 inches only

I couldn't care less about NFC, Qi charging and battery eroding QC2.0.

Other 2015 devices of interest?
  • The Xiaomi note which is very similar to the OP2 is also choking on his QHD.
  • The Note 5 is a really nice device but glass? Only 3000mAh (yes, es it does well in benchmarks but as usual in practice sammy device do worse in real life because real life is not at 200cd/m²) And knox?...Samsung lost many supporters when the abandoned technophiles for corporate purchasers. At least with OnePlus I have a warranty when I tweak my device! And a Sammy device where you can't use a custom ROM is a big no no.

Give me other ideas. I want 5.5 inches, with thin bezels, good to superb battery life, unlocked, rootable without voiding warranty, good camera and nice contrasted 1080p display. HTC and Sony let me down with sub 5.5 devices. So did LG and Motorola. In fact most flagships have preferred performance or resolution to battery life when I want the choice to have both.

It seems that for some reason OnePlus targeted exactly my needs. Xiaomi and Meizu have nice devices and even the Lenovo Zuk Z1 are appealing (despite Apple like bezels) but mostly for the Chinese market.

Since OP2 is so cheap and holds its value extremely well, this allows me to change phones with every new release at almost no cost. I love this invite system!

3. S810
Don't be unfair, it doesn't heat so much if you deactivate 2 cores down to S808 level and you still have the very nice Adreno 430 GPU.

If the device had costed more I would maybe have said: S808 does me justice, but as it is I am not gonna spit on the extra upward freedom I have. I actually think it is noticeable in every day operation.

But yes, we are at the limit of what we can cram into an octacore for a 20nm process CPU. Qualcomm messed up the release, for sure, but after the bandwidth memory changes they did, it works at lower temperatures than the S808+QHD combination, so it is still a nice upgrade. I have seen it top several benchmarks in the last couple of days (ahead of S6). In daily operation it is super smooth. Even though the N5 is not for me, I am still interested to see the kind of performance it posts.

Zenfone 2, Touch Idol, Zuk Z1 - those are all solid devices, but still midrange devices and often with large bezels and inferior cameras. Motorola prices are going down mainly in the U.S.. For other regions, not so much.

Yes, pressure is heating up in the market, but it is for everyone. Those other phones do some things right but a flagship must tick all of the following essentials:
  • Performance (be able to keep pace with the best in graphically demanding applications and have blazing fast operation)
  • Battery life (although sub flagship tend to have better battery life)
  • Camera (fast focus and snap time, high color fidelity, good HDR and video recording)
  • Premium design with thin bezels
  • Outstanding display (contrast > 1500:1, brightness >500cd/m²)
  • At least 3 competitor/own innovations (FP scanner, notification slider, laser AF, USB Type C, dual and/or USB 3.1, front facing speakers, customizable styles, Qi charging, larger camera pixels, etc.) not yet found on many devices.

In my opinion OnePlus secured these essentials and did not falter on any of them whereas others have ejected themselves from that flagship category though cheap choices on 1 or more of those components.

OnePlus Strategy?
I think the invite system works and will continue to work for many years. Evangelist marketing is a very cost effective way of crowdsourcing your marketing efforts. It is part and parcel of their business model and will allow them to keep costs lower than competition in the long run.
It creates brand loyalty (early supporters are being given preferential treatment) and quite frankly, it is reaching cult status this year in Europe, which it didn't have last year.

The only way I see Xiaomi and Meizu go past them outside of China is if they differentiate themselves enough e.g.
- though better localized support?
- though price (through their larger purchasing power)
- through better products at the same prices

OnePlus is a product oriented company, which uses word of mouth to propagate good publicity. Their sometimes outrageous press antics are part of the game, they flatter all media outlets, ensuring that they are being talked about.

They will win and die first and foremost by their product and customer experience quality. If they manage to offer good support this year, they will have done a good portion of the work already.

For all the criticism, here is a company that showed Sony, HTC and LG how launch an S810 device and look credible. I don't think they are being given enough credit for the strategic and tactical choices they made this year.

I don't see the North American delay as an issue. It is part of their Never Settle mantra - if the public reaction to some aspects of the phone is not good enough, they prefer to iron out the issues rather than go to market with mitigated word of mouth.

In that they are absolutely true to their philosophy. Never Settle also means change your mind, aknowledge product feedback and constantly work upon it. It is this mentality that will give fans the feeling that they can be trusted to develop the best product. LG, Sony and HTC each had rushed releases and ended up damaging their brand as a result.
 
Last edited:

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
That's some serious apologizing (Just clock the 810 down until it's an 808 and turn off cores, hurr), ignoring of valid points (You may not care about NFC, wireless charging, or QC but plenty of other people do), and outright speculation (You don't know how big the N5 2015 battery is).

Since OP2 is so cheap and holds its value extremely well, this allows me to change phones with every new release at almost no cost. I love this invite system!
Those two things have NOTHING to do with each other.

You say "strategic" and "tactical," I say settling. Which honestly wouldn't be such an issue if they weren't so in your face about never settling and killing 2016 (2016!) flagships. It just highlights their compromises all the more, and not in a positive light.

Shill much?
 

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
That's some serious apologizing (Just clock the 810 down until it's an 808 and turn off cores, hurr), ignoring of valid points (You may not care about NFC, wireless charging, or QC but plenty of other people do), and outright speculation (You don't know how big the N5 2015 battery is).


Those two things have NOTHING to do with each other.

You say "strategic" and "tactical," I say settling. Which honestly wouldn't be such an issue if they weren't so in your face about never settling and killing 2016 (2016!) flagships. It just highlights their compromises all the more, and not in a positive light.

Shill much?
As long as I don't pay extra for S810 instead of S808 I'd rather have S810. Sorry.

I am not ignoring valid points, they just don't apply to my particular set of preferences which I have stated very clearly.

And yes the invite system protects your investment. I have made profit with selling my second unit several months after launch...So yes it has everything to do with NFC.

If I want NFC I will just sell OP2 and buy OP3 with around 100 EUR more to pay, which will net me the S820...). I don't believe people who tell me they won't update for the S820 and prefer to buy now and not buy again for 2 years...Right now I'd rather pay only for the OP2 and postpone future needs to OP3.

Motorola reselling value won't hold as well because the device will not be rare. That's the reality of it. When I need NFC I know I will be able to purchase it for a little investment, so it is really not tormenting me at night.
 
Last edited:

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
What's this apology over? You're not addressing how simply stupid your 810 apology argument was. "It runs fine if you disable cores and underclock it." Might as well just had an 808 if that's how you feel. That extra GPU beef means nothing, especially at 1080p, when you gimp the CPU. This one decision is probably why the price went up this year, and you want to just justify it by negating it entirely? The 810 is just a bad chip. I haven't heard people with the G4 complain, and they have a higher resolution screen.

A protected investment by manufactured rarity relates to NFC... how?

If you want NFC, you get an equally spec'd Motorola in just a couple weeks for US$60 extra. That argument cuts both ways, and more favorably toward Motorola because it's available soon as opposed to maybe next year (another baseless assumption on your part), and for a smaller extra investment.

I can just about guarantee that a coil of wire for Qi and an NFC chip would not have hit their bottom line hard enough to shift their price more than $20 for the consumer.
 
Last edited:

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
The invite system turned me off completely. I know I'm not the only one too. I never resell my phones so having "exclusivity" to increase resale does nothing for me.
 

Midwayman

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
5,723
325
126
The invite system turned me off completely. I know I'm not the only one too. I never resell my phones so having "exclusivity" to increase resale does nothing for me.

Yah. I was interested in buying one until I found out about the fucked up invite system. I'm the one doing them a favor, not the other way around.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
The invite system sucks but its just like any startup offering a new service. Look at all those new Kickstarter companies or software service companies. Sign up for a waitlist. Sign up for this list. In fact the invite system OnePlus used is pretty similar to queue systems I've seen for other startups. It's probably the same OTS software.

I don't expect them to be able to deliver handsets like large OEMs can. And even if you make the argument they are OPPO, they are not really operating with the budget or resources that OPPO has. It's likely they got some seed money and are still required to operate within a certain budget as a division of OPPO.

And honestly it wasn't a bad deal just getting an invite last year. It didn't take too long.
 

Hmoobphajej

Member
Apr 8, 2011
102
0
76
I was super hyped for the phone when they announced it. Always wanted a OPO but never got a invite so ended up sticking with my HTC One until now. The invite reservation list I can deal with. I was placed around 10k when I signed up at launch but they've pushed me all the way back to 100k now. The last straw was they announced delays of invites specifically to NA. Pretty much means I wont see a invite until next year at this rate. I'm aiming at getting a Motorola X Pure Edition or waiting for the Nexus. Still on the fence about it, but One Plus is not getting my business this time around. Maybe in another two years when I need a upgrade I'll look at them again.
 

deathBOB

Senior member
Dec 2, 2007
569
239
116
Specs aside, I don't trust them to put out a quality product and I don't feel like gambling with their support.
 

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
What's this apology over? You're not addressing how simply stupid your 810 apology argument was. "It runs fine if you disable cores and underclock it." Might as well just had an 808 if that's how you feel. That extra GPU beef means nothing, especially at 1080p, when you gimp the CPU. This one decision is probably why the price went up this year, and you want to just justify it by negating it entirely? The 810 is just a bad chip. I haven't heard people with the G4 complain, and they have a higher resolution screen.

A protected investment by manufactured rarity relates to NFC... how?

If you want NFC, you get an equally spec'd Motorola in just a couple weeks for US$60 extra. That argument cuts both ways, and more favorably toward Motorola because it's available soon as opposed to maybe next year (another baseless assumption on your part), and for a smaller extra investment.

I can just about guarantee that a coil of wire for Qi and an NFC chip would not have hit their bottom line hard enough to shift their price more than $20 for the consumer.

You don't know what you are talking about.
Out of 15 benchmarks, the OP2 easily beats the LG G4 in all but 2 (Google Octane and Nenamark 2, and it is 50/50 on Vellamo).
Geekbench
Antutu
Quadrant
Basemark OS II
Sunspider 1.0.2
Kraken 1.1
AndEBench Pro
3DMark IS Unlimited
CFbench
GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
Linpack
Vellamo 3.0 (50/50)
GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (fps)


It also beats the S6 in 8 out of those 15 benchmarks. The S801 used to overheat when it was first brought out. Now it runs like a champ. I think Qualcomm were just rushed by Apple's initiated 64bit trend and had to go to market 2 months earlier than they would have liked. That's all there is to it. You should not look at CPU's as invariable quantities. Over time the S820 will develop its full potential. Hell most games/apps are not even yet optimized for Octacores!

The S810 as it was configured BEFORE was a bad chip with very poor chipset drivers. Since the update I have heard only good things about it, M9, Mi Note Pro now OnePlus 2 and I have no doubt that like other chips before it will get better during its life cycle.

It is obvious that it is a nice upgrade from the S808.

Not only that but it also has more downclocking potential than the S808, giving the OP2 additional battery reserves in the form of greater downclocking (and, accessorily, brightness reduction) potential.

You disfigured my point where I was saying, that even if the cores being used were reduced to S808 level, the S810 would still shine through the GPU.

Adreno 430 is NOT available on the S808...For that alone the upgrade is worthwhile. It gives the phone future-proofing with regards to future games.

The fact that they offer it at a cheaper price than Motorola's S808 device means I have ZERO reservations. The Moto X will have exactly the same limitations as the LG G4.

I bought the OP1 and am an early subscriber of their forum, so I am Tier 2 and will get my invitation within the next week.

OP2 is only hard to get if you are only discovering them now and have to go through the reservation system instead of the OnePlus forum membership. The reservation list is Tier 4...

The fact that by buying each OP generation I have preferential opportunities for future generations of the OP phones on its own is worth me buying the OP2.

The Motorola anyways is nowhere near the cheap U.S. price in outside of the U.S. In EMEA we have to pay 120 USD more for the 64GB version vs. the OnePlus 2.

I wouldn't know what to do with NFC. Motorola is less prominent than OnePlus in Europe, I think that's why they designed their phone more to U.S. requirements, whereas OP is primarily interested in Asia and Europe, where they can penetrate more easily without partnership with telecom operators. I think your sales channels in the U.S. are off-putting for new entrants - to me this more than anything explains why the OP2 has no NFC. A majority of people couldn't care less. They delayed their U.S. launch to give more capacity for other markets and when they started in India, no review gave a damn about NFC. This is just not being used outside of the U.S.
 
Last edited:

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Protect your investment? Wat?

Phones aren't investments, they are consumables. If you think some cramped invite system somehow protects your money, you probably should be buying Nokia 630's or Moto E's.
If you fret over loosing a couple of hundred bucks a year because you keep swapping flagship phones, you should probably get another hobby.
 

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
OPO gets no love from me until they finally get rid of their invite system completely, from day 1 of a new product launch. Maybe if they do that with the OnePlus Three I'll seriously consider getting one.. I mean Three. :p

The reservation list is basically only for people who have not purchased the OP1 or are not a member in their forum. But if you don't start at some point you will always have to go through the reservation list.

if you purchased their OP1 then you basically receive a personalized launch card and can you purchase immediately without the need to wait for an email invitation.
 

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
Protect your investment? Wat?

Phones aren't investments, they are consumables. If you think some cramped invite system somehow protects your money, you probably should be buying Nokia 630's or Moto E's.
If you fret over loosing a couple of hundred bucks a year because you keep swapping flagship phones, you should probably get another hobby.

I am not. That's the point! No one should feel bad about buying the OP3 when it is launched in a few months because OP2 can be resold easily and the OP3 would be such a small invesment. Android Pay will need at least a year to become more established, so no harm done. And anyways the OP3 upgrade will net you +25% power efficiency and +35% performance (i.e. S820). Even without NFC it will be a worthy upgrade!
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
The reservation list is basically only for people who have not purchased the OP1 or are not a member in their forum. But if you don't start at some point you will always have to go through the reservation list.

if you purchased their OP1 then you basically receive a personalized launch card and can you purchase immediately without the need to wait for an email invitation.

Or I could just buy a ZenFone 2 without jumping through any hoops.
 

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
Or I could just buy a ZenFone 2 without jumping through any hoops.

Yes you could. Personally I don't buy the OP2 because it is cheap though, I still need a flagship level phone, with flagship level of performance, camera and thin bezels.

For me the Zenfone 2 like the Lenovo Zuk Z1 has bezels almost as big as iPhone 6.

Note sure what you could buy for the same price that is remotely as good. Maybe LG G Flex 2? Or for just a bit more money the Moto X style?
 

Rayb

Member
Dec 31, 2008
122
1
76
Anyone else getting a really strong Viral Marketing vibe?

True, looks like somebody is getting paid by the word judging by the wall of text in the last few posts.

And just to rub it in, a quote from another poster;
Sorry but the OPO has been replaced by the Asus Zenphone 2 IMO as the value leader.

I'm sure a lot of people will agree with it.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
Yes you could. Personally I don't buy the OP2 because it is cheap though, I still need a flagship level phone, with flagship level of performance, camera and thin bezels.

To be honest, the OP2 doesn't have flagship levels of any of the above. IMO the only real "flagships" of 2015 are the current iPhones and the Galaxy phones. A large part is the fault of Qualcomm, but the OP2 has late 2014/early 2015 levels of performance and bezels. The industry has moved on. Same with the Moto X Style - it's good that there are options that focus on key features and price, vs. getting the all-out best in everything.

Camera from what I see is decent but not the match of the S6/Note 5/G4 in speed, focus, and all round quality. Again, a very good late 2014 level camera.

So you're getting an upper mid-range phone missing some standard features at mid-range prices. A decent bargain for some, but not exactly something to get excited about unless you're on a budget.
 
Last edited:

puremind

Junior Member
Mar 26, 2013
15
0
0
To be honest, the OP2 doesn't have flagship levels of any of the above. IMO the only real "flagships" of 2015 are the current iPhones and the Galaxy phones. A large part is the fault of Qualcomm, but the OP2 has late 2014/early 2015 levels of performance and bezels. The industry has moved on. Same with the Moto X Style - it's good that there are options that focus on key features and price, vs. getting the all-out best in everything.

Camera from what I see is decent but not the match of the S6/Note 5/G4 in speed, focus, and all round quality. Again, a very good late 2014 level camera.

So you're getting an upper mid-range phone missing some standard features at mid-range prices. A decent bargain for some, but not exactly something to get excited about unless you're on a budget.

Who are you kidding?
  • LG G4 and S6 easily beat the old 8MP camera of the iPhone 6. IPhone 6 Plus also has 2013 kind of bezels, hell, even the 5.7" Moto X or Note 5 are smaller in comparison? This is no flagship level bezels at all
  • Performance-wise iPhone 6 Plus is also behind, hell even behind S808 devices
  • Small battery that will just last a day

2015 all dervices are bezelless. Moto X, OnePlus 2, Note 5. This is a must for any flagship device.

OP2 beats Galaxy S6 in 8 out of 15 benchmarks. But real life performance is where the OP2 shines. Like HTC Sense, feels super smooth compared to Samsung devices.

S6 did good in the 150cd/m² battery tests but now all users are reporting poor battery life, which is kind of the basic requirement for any flagship.
They also did good in a lot of performance benchmarks, managing to win vs. OP2 in 7 out of 15. But real life? Have you been using it? The home screen transitions don't seem smooth at all. Even Note 5 has multitasking issues. And the worst part is you can't remove TouchWiz without losing warranty. Samsung have alienated technophiles with Knox and their anti rooting stance.
Same Galaxy face with logo at the front for so many generations. Not an exciting design when competition offer swappable designs with leather, wood, carbon fiber, Kevlar, etc. Samsung feels behind the curve in terms of design. All to protect their margins. Just bland.
Smallish screen is also not up to par. They should have increased it to 5.3" like Xiami / Meizu.

S6 is probably the least successful galaxy phone of all times. It manages to do poorly with stellar components inside in all areas but camera and display.

There is more to a flagship phone than an addition of components and features.

HTC have such a nice software with Sense 7. But they did not produce a good camera and remained stuck at 5 inches...

I think nowadays where most phone have capable CPUs, what makes a good flagship is going to be the day to day experience of using the software more than anything else. Despite all their flaws, the iPhones manage to squeeze te best out of under-specced components.

Samsung just spoil the best hardware on just the shittiest piece of Software. They should just drop the Touchwiz branding and completely revamp their image. Redo the Software from scratch. It has become so overblown and unwieldy.

As unlocked Phones OP2 and Moto X Style with near stock experience will have very smooth day to day operation. The tactile response on the OP2 is excellent. And Motorola may not have the chops in terms of the GPU but the rest is really solid. The design is also more exciting and like the OP2 it has thinner bezels.