LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
Zebo,
Implied in my last is the reason but, since it is a "PSS"... ..
The separation issue is raised in everything.. nominations, war powers, informational requests, and on and on. Short of investigating an impeachable offense (must be so stated) or some criminal court proceeding, the papers of the Executive are separate and apart from Congress and that other branch. Just about every thing is under the cloak of executive privilege. The key to unlocking that vault is when there is evidence of an incriminating or exculpatory nature and even then the 'privilege' may allow for redacted submission.. IMO
I'd have to go back to the discussions with Madison and Hamilton and the others regarding this and why the lower and the USSCourt itself tends to invoke "political basis" as the reason to not even hear many cases. I don't even know if I still have it.. been so long.. and settled..
PSS I still don't understand why congress would have to sue for compliance and direction. Seems the USSC should step in if someone brings a case..no?
Implied in my last is the reason but, since it is a "PSS"... ..
The separation issue is raised in everything.. nominations, war powers, informational requests, and on and on. Short of investigating an impeachable offense (must be so stated) or some criminal court proceeding, the papers of the Executive are separate and apart from Congress and that other branch. Just about every thing is under the cloak of executive privilege. The key to unlocking that vault is when there is evidence of an incriminating or exculpatory nature and even then the 'privilege' may allow for redacted submission.. IMO
I'd have to go back to the discussions with Madison and Hamilton and the others regarding this and why the lower and the USSCourt itself tends to invoke "political basis" as the reason to not even hear many cases. I don't even know if I still have it.. been so long.. and settled..