• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

i found this article from cnn to be an interesting read...

spanky

spanky

Lifer
link

its about how nixon contemplated using a nuke for vietnam.

He told Time magazine then: "I rejected the bombing of the dikes, which would have drowned 1 million people, for the same reason that I rejected the nuclear option. Because the targets presented were not military targets."

i'm not a veteran from vietnam, but from what i understand, it was pretty d@mn hard to differentiate between civilians and hostile fighters. thinking back... we (as in the USA) didn't gain anything from vietnam, did we? what were we fighting for? was it just another chapter in the cold war?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top