Tolkien >> Whatever author you like
i politely disagree. Heinlein walks all over stuffy ol' JRT.
Asimov. Clarke. Herbert. etc.
Anyway, funny story, it took me 15 years to read Lotr. I guess i could never be bothered, although i did read the hobbit, that other story about the dragon slayer (farmer giles, tnx google) .. plus ofc i watched the 1980s animated film.
So, funny bit. At the time i had been playing D&D and every one of my friends read Lotr, and basically, they assumed i did as well, and i .. lied. I guess i just went with it, and never said "well, i actually never read the thang".
So while we were cool talking about trolls and dragons n stuff, when people started talking about stuff like Lothlorien and Minas Morgul, i just kinda went "uuh, yeah, ofc i know that".
15 years and nobody realized i never read the bloody thing. Even had arguments about elves and various middle-earth lore, but never read it.
Its just that tolkien-stuff permeates the world of RPGs, you absorb it even without reading Lotr.
Also, while the story is great .. great premise, great characters ..
first off, tolkien just up n repeats whole paragraphs; i was honestly "wtf" surprised, but he has this thing that he'll just have a description of something be with the same exact wording as something 100 pages earlier.
His writing stile is quite verbose, and not really in a fresh, colorful way. He was good at building a story, but his style leaves to be desired.
and .. the frikkin eagles still piss me off.
Besides that, great book. I did like the hobbit better though.
Had a friend once who wrote a dissertion on how the hobbit is a child's story, and its journey represents growing up, while Lotr is a proper fantasy story; imho, its not quite like that.
The hobbit has some liberties with the story, like the troll's comic relief for example, but in the end, there's twists involving greed, breakdown of friendship, mistrust and racism.
Lotr on the other hand is all about buddies sticking it out ot the end, and with the boromir / faramir backstory, it's both the ring's evil action clearly to blame, and the bad guys are made out to be plain bad guys, secondary characters who represent the simple moral choice our heroes must beat. (effortlessly)
Nothing like bilbo being held up and nearly thrown down the wall by his former friends, blinded by greed and vengeance. After all, the arkenstone is just a stone. Barin's desire to restore his home is more about him losing face in front of his clan, and wanting vengeance on the goblins for what is essentially a fu*up by the dwarves themselves.
oh look i've gone and done it again. its boring here at work, i go into walloftext mode.