http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/26/wells-fargo-stumpf/
Yup. QE causes money hoarding. Thats what I see when I read this. Just like Japan, America will trend towards a higher savings rate in the face of dropping money velocity due to QE. Its an instinctual reaction to hoard money when it flows slower through the economy.
Corporations are already hoarding money, hence stagnant wages.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business...ard-is-bigger-than-the-gdp-of-germany/260006/
You stubbornly refuse to properly connect cause & effect.
In the aftermath of any economic shock, there is a general flight to safety among people who have money to save or invest, and saving is obviously safer, particularly in the form of US treasuries & govt insured accounts.
In the face of low demand, investment is riskier, and we obviously have low real demand. In the face of enormous losses from previous over extension of credit, lenders are much more cautious, and investors even more so. Bank reserves build as a consequence of these things combined.
This is entirely independent of QE.
When the FRB buys treasuries as QE, it can't do so directly from the govt, but rather from intermediaries, member banks or private parties. Sellers make a small profit on the deal, and also obtain cash instead of bonds, cash to do whatever they please. This encourages lending & investment.
When the FRB buys other credit instruments, like MBS, the sellers receive cash, encouraging lending & investment in the same fashion. The FRB is free of the normal constraints of profit & loss. Even if they lose money on bonds, it doesn't matter.
I realize that seems strange, but it's the truth. The FRB can't go broke, by definition. They remove risk from the marketplace with QE, thus encouraging lending & investment.
In circumstances other than a liquidity trap in a depressed economy, QE would be inflationary, strongly increasing the velocity of money. As it is, the FRB is pushing on a rope in many respects, barely able to overcome the strongly deflationary forces in the market.
That's because they can't put money directly into the hands of people who will spend it. Only govt spending that will cause people to be hired can do that in the current business climate, because govt need not respond to normal market forces of demand & profit.