- Oct 30, 1999
- 11,815
- 104
- 106
So I'm with Intel talking about laptops. We're talking about modularity (is that a real word?), upgradeability and creating standards. The usual.
I'm looking at their white copy and they've seperated the market into "Value" and "Performance".
What about Value/Performance?
Am I alone on this?
I must be because obviously a big company like Intel hasn't taken this into consideration.
What's the first this that you, I or a customer is going to ask when looking at a laptop?
"How much is it?"
Intel thinks there is LOW END (12-13" dual scan with a Celeron) and there is HIGH END (P4 with 14-15" active matrix screen) and that's it.
Are they really this clueless?
What if you have someone that does alot with Power point presentations on the road. Does he need a P3 or P4? No. How about a larger monitor? Yes. Want to make sure those slide look as good as they do on the projection as they do on your screen!
What if you have someone that crunches a lot of numbers or does a lot of multitasking and would appreciate a faster CPU, but doesn't need the multimedia advantages of a large, active matrix screen?
Is this really the sort of tunnel vision the industry leader has???
I'm looking at their white copy and they've seperated the market into "Value" and "Performance".
What about Value/Performance?
Am I alone on this?
I must be because obviously a big company like Intel hasn't taken this into consideration.
What's the first this that you, I or a customer is going to ask when looking at a laptop?
"How much is it?"
Intel thinks there is LOW END (12-13" dual scan with a Celeron) and there is HIGH END (P4 with 14-15" active matrix screen) and that's it.
Are they really this clueless?
What if you have someone that does alot with Power point presentations on the road. Does he need a P3 or P4? No. How about a larger monitor? Yes. Want to make sure those slide look as good as they do on the projection as they do on your screen!
What if you have someone that crunches a lot of numbers or does a lot of multitasking and would appreciate a faster CPU, but doesn't need the multimedia advantages of a large, active matrix screen?
Is this really the sort of tunnel vision the industry leader has???
