First of all Trump says that he's not being investigated.
LOL you're being sarcastic right?
Furthermore there's no evidence that he commited any crimes.
First of all, there is direct evidence of obstruction of justice. Trump admitting last week that he fired Comey over the Russia investigation. An alleged Comey memo which, if true, indicates that Trump asked Comey to kill the investigation of Flynn. You might look into how obstruction is legally defined at the federal level.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1503
It's extremely broad.
So far as collusion with the Russians, there are plenty of suspicious circumstances, otherwise known as circumstantial evidence, or else there wouldn't be several active, pending investigations to begin with. This "no evidence" formulation is absurd. You mean there is no smoking gun, and insufficient evidence to obtain a conviction at this point. Based on what is
publicly known so far, I would agree.
If you really are ignorant of the boatloads of suspicious circumstances, which include multiple lies told by Trump and his compatriots in relation to his and his campaign's connections to Russia, then you need to bone up on it. Even a greatly condensed summary of it is beyond the length limitations of forum posts.
This is a dream of the left. If he is convicted, he'll be replaced by another Republican
Of course you would think this is really about whether a D or R is in the oval office. The thing is, people on the left know that Pence would be president (yeah, Jedi is engaging in wishful thinking). And they know that Pence is even more conservative than Trump. Yet they want Trump out of office and would rather have Pence. That should tell you right there that there is something more to this than mere partisanship. We really think Trump is corrupt and totally unfit for office.