Nothing like making comments without knowing a nything about live recordings and "tapers" in general.
It depends on sound quality, but a good live recording can be much much better than in studio. As for live, not many bands are truely good live and deserve to be a studio band.
I'm going to resurrect this thread to show OP exactly why live recordings are awesome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfy-ulQiYAQ
This is the Queens of the Stone Age doing "Regular John" in Amsterdam. Skip to about 3:45. The band starts the songs breakdown and then break into a jam session for the next 5 minutes before finishing up the last of the song. You get to see how good basically every person in the band is at their instruments. It's really, really good!
Why was Arcadio banned?
Looks like it was for omitting the letter H? :^D
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=29615314&highlight=#post29615314
when they could listen to the album version....
Live versions are meant to be experienced "Live" in concert.
The album version is always better than the live version, except when the live version is meant to be different on purpose (i.e. unplugged).
:thumbsup: they played Breath when I saw them... and it was AMAZING <3Anyone who's seen Pearl Jam live can answer this question.