I've been trying out the Windows 7 Pro x64. Used Windows Server 2003 previously.
Well the user interface in desktop looks pretty. But I don't care. All that will do is suck up more system juice.
I suppose this has a bit better memory management over the King Kong champion Windows Server 2003. But I didn't notice speed difference. And network file transfer speed is about the same. Server 2003 is twice as fast as Windows XP in this regard.
Windows 7 is flakey, or hiccups easily when running my programs, i.e. video playback software made by russian scientists. For example, I start the video (1080i MPEG2-TS) and the first frame of the video displays and will not move on to next frame. The sound continues to play fine. I have to quit the playback and play again and again and again until it works. This is so [lame]...
uTorrent program only works if you reinstall. The next time you try to start uTorrent again it won't start.... You have to reinstall the damn thing again. And it takes a long time for the user interface to pop up. It's blazing fast with Server 2003. Does Win7 have DEP? Anyways, it's slow as dog. 😀
The BIGGEST problem with Windows 7 is the text quality in the display. The pixels are not lining up so the texts looks [bad]. Sometimes I could hardly identify what the hell the character is. I have to like stare at it for a minute to figure it out and make guess. Windows Server 2003 in comparison, is razor sharp, clearly defined, dot by dot, perfectly lined up pixels. It runs in 1:1 pixel mapping btw. The texts are so sharp it's like poking my eyeballs with a needle.
It's a downgrade going from Server 2003 32bit to Windows 7 64.
There are a lot of other issues with Windows 7 that I didn't cover here. If I mention them, it will take up over 10 pages.... don't have time to post all that [stuff].
^_^
cheez
No profanity in the technical forums
-ViRGE
Well the user interface in desktop looks pretty. But I don't care. All that will do is suck up more system juice.
I suppose this has a bit better memory management over the King Kong champion Windows Server 2003. But I didn't notice speed difference. And network file transfer speed is about the same. Server 2003 is twice as fast as Windows XP in this regard.
Windows 7 is flakey, or hiccups easily when running my programs, i.e. video playback software made by russian scientists. For example, I start the video (1080i MPEG2-TS) and the first frame of the video displays and will not move on to next frame. The sound continues to play fine. I have to quit the playback and play again and again and again until it works. This is so [lame]...
uTorrent program only works if you reinstall. The next time you try to start uTorrent again it won't start.... You have to reinstall the damn thing again. And it takes a long time for the user interface to pop up. It's blazing fast with Server 2003. Does Win7 have DEP? Anyways, it's slow as dog. 😀
The BIGGEST problem with Windows 7 is the text quality in the display. The pixels are not lining up so the texts looks [bad]. Sometimes I could hardly identify what the hell the character is. I have to like stare at it for a minute to figure it out and make guess. Windows Server 2003 in comparison, is razor sharp, clearly defined, dot by dot, perfectly lined up pixels. It runs in 1:1 pixel mapping btw. The texts are so sharp it's like poking my eyeballs with a needle.
It's a downgrade going from Server 2003 32bit to Windows 7 64.
There are a lot of other issues with Windows 7 that I didn't cover here. If I mention them, it will take up over 10 pages.... don't have time to post all that [stuff].
^_^
cheez
No profanity in the technical forums
-ViRGE
Last edited by a moderator: