You're missing the point. Ponson (opposing pitcher) didn't intentionally hit the White Sox batters. I agree with you, that throwing at someone is warranted in retaliation for someone who was intentionally hit. Guillen was just being a pu$$y about it, just like Big Unit and his pu$$y catcher did last week and got suspended 5 games for it. These morons are such primadonnas that if ANYONE hits them, even unintentionally, they will retaliate. That's not the right way to play the game, that's a pu$$y right there. I have no respect for pitchers/managers who intentionally hit someone for no reason. If my cleanup guy just hit 2 HRs and gets plunked, then yeah I'm going to retaliate. If my cleanup guy gets hit with men on base in a close game, then I'm not going to retaliate it's no big deal. Big difference.Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Classless players and teams bean other players. I hate it! I haven't seen the Cards purposefully hit people, nor have i seen the Nationals do it (This year at least). I liked the Astros until they decided to pitch at Bonds (I dislike Bonds in almost every way but you dont pitch at someone).
-Kevin
I used to pitch in Middle School and High School. If I was on the mound and somebody threw at one of my guys, I may have waited a few innings, but sure enough someone got theirs.
It keeps the game in check. If a team knows they can throw at guys and you won't do anything about them, it gives them free reign to throw purposely at your studs and allows them to work the inside part of the plate real tight and then they come back outside after the back you off.
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Sukhoi
Retaliation is part of the game. And that pitcher was an idiot for refusing to hit the batter. I agree with you on the rest of the stuff.
Retaliation is not a part of the game. Thats like saying when driving, if someone cuts you off you have to rear end them to get back.
Notice people embrace the classy players, Pujols, Clemens, Jeter (etc...). People like Guillen and Pierzynski (Not to pick on the White Sox because i really do like them) lack all of that class.
I have played baseball since i was a little kid (T-Ball) and never once have i heard that hitting a batter in retaliation is acceptable. I applaud that pitcher for not hitting the batter. I would never pitch (Im a pitcher) at someone, regardless of the consequences (And that includes Bonds).
-Kevin
It keeps the game in check. If a team knows they can throw at guys and you won't do anything about them, it gives them free reign to throw purposely at your studs and allows them to work the inside part of the plate real tight and then they come back outside after the back you off.
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
It keeps the game in check. If a team knows they can throw at guys and you won't do anything about them, it gives them free reign to throw purposely at your studs and allows them to work the inside part of the plate real tight and then they come back outside after the back you off.
Maybe in a game with no umpires. There is no need to retaliate. If a guy continues to hit guys he will get ejected; there is no need to take it into your own hands. Let the people play the game, dont take the game out of their hands just because you have a chip on your shoulder.
::snip::
I just lost all baseball credibility. Ok example for Clemens. Minor league start a few weeks ago, the guy with the same number as him came up to the plate. He decided ill throw him a slow one right down the center and let him jack it. He did and the guy drove it a mile and a half. Afterwards (after the game) Clemens laughed and congratulated the player and what not. He sacrificed his ERA just for the hell of it.
Ill condone some inside pitches to back players off the plate, but make no mistake, it is never acceptable to purposely hit another player.
-Kevin
Originally posted by: z42
HAHAHAHAHAHA You just lost all baseball credibility. Clemens is a class act? That guy throws at anyone who gets close to the plate. If he's really on his 'roid rage he might even throw a bat at you. By the way, T-ball is not professional baseball. You really know nothing about baseball if you have never heard that retaliation is acceptable. IT"S REQUIRED. You seem to live in some kind of baseball fairy tale land where the other team wants you to win. The only way to protect your players from getting thrown at is retaliation. If your pitching staff doesn't protect it's own hitters when the team's perception is that they are being intentionally hit then your players will continue to get hit.
I'm not saying that Guillen isn't a nutjob, he most definitely is. He's a macho, ignorant, ethnocentric hot-head. But he is a good manager and he was right to send the pitcher back to the minors for not hitting the guy in the hip. It's debatable whether he should have yelled at the guy. You can look at it from the young pitcher's POV, or you can look at it from the manager's where a rookie is defying him in front of the team.
In summary:
1. Retaliation is required. You can hit someone in the thigh/waist area to make a point without hurting them.
2. Guillen is a wacko
3. Pitcher should have listened to his boss in his first week on the job.
Originally posted by: daveymark
looks like ozzie just got suspended for admitting baseball's dirty little secret. Like Cuban says - "a business expense"
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Sukhoi
Retaliation is part of the game. And that pitcher was an idiot for refusing to hit the batter. I agree with you on the rest of the stuff.
Retaliation is not a part of the game. Thats like saying when driving, if someone cuts you off you have to rear end them to get back.
Notice people embrace the classy players, Pujols, Clemens, Jeter (etc...). People like Guillen and Pierzynski (Not to pick on the White Sox because i really do like them) lack all of that class.
I have played baseball since i was a little kid (T-Ball) and never once have i heard that hitting a batter in retaliation is acceptable. I applaud that pitcher for not hitting the batter. I would never pitch (Im a pitcher) at someone, regardless of the consequences (And that includes Bonds).
-Kevin
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: daveymark
looks like ozzie just got suspended for admitting baseball's dirty little secret. Like Cuban says - "a business expense"
He didn't get suspended for that. He got suspended because he order RP Riske to plunk Chris Duncan after warnings were issued.
-Kevin
Originally posted by: Alprazolam
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: daveymark
looks like ozzie just got suspended for admitting baseball's dirty little secret. Like Cuban says - "a business expense"
He didn't get suspended for that. He got suspended because he order RP Riske to plunk Chris Duncan after warnings were issued.
-Kevin
Ozzie did that to stand up for his team dumbass. The sox always get hit, and then get warned so they can't retaliate, well he got fed up.
This thread SUCKS a big one.
You just contradict yourself by naming Clemens.
He is notorious for retaliation and he pitches inside more than any pitcher.
Originally posted by: Sukhoi
I didn't realize it was David Riske that refused to hit the batter. He's been around for ages, and knows what he was supposed to do. I don't understand why he wouldn't hit the batter, unless it was a good friend or something.
Originally posted by: Sukhoi
Ah, nevermind then. I must have confused the two situations.