bystander36
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2013
- 5,154
- 132
- 106
My opinion is that you think marketing is fact based, when in reality marketing is them trying to sell you a game by telling you what they think you want to hear.
No. I'm referring to the implication that the fact they think it's what players want to hear suggests there are such players that's the issue. If you want to argue they're wrong and players don't want to hear that, that's one opinion that would address the issue.My opinion is that you think marketing is fact based, when in reality marketing is them trying to sell you a game by telling you what they think you want to hear.
We don't really disagree on what they think players want to hear. I just think it's simply because that is what players want to hear, and not necessarily what anyone actually thinks. I believe it comes down to them knowing that the graphics that are presented are going to scare off a lot of customers, so they try to address that issue with marketing.No. I'm referring to the implication that the fact they think it's what players want to hear suggests there are such players that's the issue. If you want to argue they're wrong and players don't want to hear that, that's one opinion that would address the issue.
I think that's a valid theory. What's not correct is the statement about thinking marketing is fact-based.We don't really disagree on what they think players want to hear. I just think it's simply because that is what players want to hear, and not necessarily what anyone actually thinks. I believe it comes down to them knowing that the graphics that are presented are going to scare off a lot of customers, so they try to address that issue with marketing.
What, you think marketing is fact-based? It might try to be close to it, but marketing doesn't have to be based on facts when it is an selling based on opinion.I think that's a valid theory. What's not correct is the statement about thinking marketing is fact-based.
Marketing is not fact based. It can be in some cases sure, but in other cases its complete made up BS just to get you to purchase the products. At best id say its 50/50 fact/fiction.I think that's a valid theory. What's not correct is the statement about thinking marketing is fact-based.
Craig234: I think the sky is blue. bystander36: "What, you think the sky is not blue?" Some people's reading comprehension is appalling.What, you think marketing is fact-based?
What was confusing is that you said you disagreed with me thinking you believe marketing is fact based.Really? This 'marketing being fact based' is now confusing?
Marketing is not 'fact-based'. It might have facts, because they serve the purpose of promoting the message. It might not. It might distort them.
But what's relevant here is that while it's unreliable about facts it contains, it largely does reflect the consumers' interests.
So you don't see ads for an airline that say 'we spend the least on safety, because that gives more of the excitement you want!' Why not? Because consumers DON'T want that excitement. if they did, you probably WOULD see that ad.
Now, it's inexact - large advertisers tend to have well-researched, polled, focus group tested advertising, while smaller advertisers might just have guesses, and sometimes they get it wrong. But advertising mostly helps show what their customers want to hear.
When the word 'sugar' was dropped from cereal names, it wasn't because the 'fact' of the sugar was removed, it was because the word sugar went from a marketing positive to a marketing negative with customers. That's the difference in low-res graphics being marketed or not - what it says about the players' opinions of it.
What is confusing about that? You're the one who claimed I said marketing is fact-based when I didn't.What was confusing is that you said you disagreed with me thinking you believe marketing is fact based.
While I agree it can be fact based, much of marketing is not.
No, I'm not saying that. In fact, they don't 'say' people prefer pixel graphics. What I said was, that they put the pixel graphics as a marketing bullet to promote the game, implying that they think their market does see that as a positive, which surprised me - and while not a 'fact', such marketing assumptions generally are not far off, as I've discussed above. But feel free to say you don't hold that view, as I don't.Anyway, for what ever reason, you believe that if they say people prefer pixel graphics, it has to be based on fact. My experience is they can state any opinion they want, with no facts to back it up, as by definition, opinions don't require facts.
Go back and reread what I wrote:What is confusing about that? You're the one who claimed I said marketing is fact-based when I didn't.
No, I'm not saying that. In fact, they don't 'say' people prefer pixel graphics. What I said was, that they put the pixel graphics as a marketing bullet to promote the game, implying that they think their market does see that as a positive, which surprised me - and while not a 'fact', such marketing assumptions generally are not far off, as I've discussed above. But feel free to say you don't hold that view, as I don't.
Clearly you misunderstood what you read. No harm.My opinion is that you think marketing is fact based, when in reality marketing is them trying to sell you a game by telling you what they think you want to hear.
One of the options was for people to say they don't prefer pixel graphics. If no one does, that was a lot of arguing and anger for nothing from some. I don't recall everywhere I've seen praise of pixelated games, the marketing bullet was the surprise, this is a discussion to see people's opinions, and in particular if anyone had any info on why some might prefer the pixel graphics look other than nostalgia.This whole topic was based on you trying to understand why people prefer pixel graphics, when you've not run into anyone who has said that. Only marketing that has said that.
I don't think I misunderstood what you said, but you might have understood what I said, but I agree, no harm. Your opinion that I think marketing is entirely fact-based isn't correct, but I've discussed that in some detail above.Clearly you misunderstood what you read. No harm.
One thing about marketing is it can be misleading. Some people may prefer "Pixel games", but that doesn't mean it was the graphics that caused them to prefer those games.One of the options was for people to say they don't prefer pixel graphics. If no one does, that was a lot of arguing and anger for nothing from some. I don't recall everywhere I've seen praise of pixelated games, the marketing bullet was the surprise, this is a discussion to see people's opinions, and in particular if anyone had any info on why some might prefer the pixel graphics look other than nostalgia.
This is funny, and probably not for the reason you intended.Craig234: I think the sky is blue. bystander36: "What, you think the sky is not blue?" Some people's reading comprehension is appalling.
Clueless, which is ok, and rude, which isn't, added to ignore.This is funny, and probably not for the reason you intended.
Oh look, yet another example where it's okay for you say crap about other people, but not for them to say the exact same thing about you.Clueless, which is ok, and rude, which isn't, added to ignore.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
I | Have you ever gotten a AAA game in Fanatical's mystery bundle? | PC Games | 1 | |
![]() |
Suggestions for a similar game to this? | PC Games | 9 | |
![]() |
Question does playing at 30 fps mean ruining the game? | PC Games | 13 | |
![]() |
Recommend an older user a game like Doom. | PC Games | 17 | |
D | Raze and individual game profiles possible? | PC Games | 0 |