i dont care what anybody says michael jackson is guilty

[boyRacer]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Sid59
ha. everyone thinks he's guilty. i believe in him.

You probably believe in Peter Pan too!

i believe in tinkerbell.

 

[Siddhartha]

Originally posted by: tomwolfman
ya that's right dude ,guilty until proven innocent

 

[Ladies Man]

Jackson is MOST DEFINITELY guilty.

He did it at least once and that is for sure.
Otherwise why would he have paid off the first kid for $14-40 million?

It was soooo bad the first time that immediately after that happened it went into law that had to go to trial and there were no out of court settlements on such charges.

 

[Ns1]

only 2 people in the world really know what happened.

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: Dr Smooth

Originally posted by: tomwolfman
ya that's right dude ,guilty until proven innocent

I could care less, he is a freak and shouldn't be around kids. Look what he did to his baby.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: minendo

Originally posted by: franguinho
i hope he gets what he deserves. filthy child molestor. i cant believe anyone actually buys the crap he is selling (i guess i have to specify: by "crap" i mean lies, not records, although they both qualify)

/rant

-frang

ps - mjnews.us is garbage, the extreme opposite of tabloids, such biased, pro-michael jackson bullcrap if you ask me.

You're just pissed that he wouldn't play with you.

Or, that he didn't get invited for a "sleepover" at the MJ's house.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: NeuroSynapsis
only 2 people in the world really know what happened.

That's right - the "giver" and the "receiver." Guilty ... as charged. 😉

 

[LAUST]

and you buy into the tabloids? You are a Media Sheep is all.

 

[BunLengthHotDog]

IF he is found guilty, the parents of these children ought to be thrown in the same jailcell with him....asses leaving their kids with someone like Jackson overnight. ANY grown man who sleeps with kids (beit molestation, or actually simply sleeping) should NOT be trusted with your childs life / well-being.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: boyRacer

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Sid59
ha. everyone thinks he's guilty. i believe in him.

You probably believe in Peter Pan too!

i believe in tinkerbell.

i wanna nail tinkerbell. she should be just the right size! err..😱

 

[Ryan]

If you can read this link, and still believe he's 100% guilty, you're a dumbass. http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/140025p-124183c.html

Sure, the guy is a weirdo, a serious one, but that still doesn't make him a child molester.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20031126/D7V2ECAO0.html - even more proof that this kids parents are more than likely lying.

 

[eakers]

it makes me absolutly sick that a parent would allow their children to play with micheal jackson after the last alleged molestation.

its even sicker if they did it for the payout.

 

[BunLengthHotDog]

Link would be applicable if this was a civil case, not criminal...Typical defense strategy to cast the plaintiffs in a bad light.

 

[StageLeft]

i hope he gets what he deserves. filthy child molestor. i cant believe anyone actually buys the crap he is selling (i guess i have to specify: by "crap" i mean lies, not records, although they both qualify)

And why do you buy the "crap" that the accuser is selling? Who knows what went on? Let the courts decide. MJ is a frigging weirdo, but he's also a very easy target for such accusations. Personally I expect he is guilty but there is a big chance he isn't as well, so let the courts play it out. None of us know sh*t about this, quite frankly.

 

[Alex]

Originally posted by: feralkid

Originally posted by: tomwolfman
ya that's right dude ,guilty until proven innocent

No kidding...I don't know what disgusts me more; Jackson, if guilty, or this Maroon for posting such trash.

How the H3LL do you KNOW he's guilty?

He may well be, but to post that "i dont care what anybody says michael jackson is guilty" is the height of hubris, ignorance and poor taste.

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: PipBoy

Originally posted by: franguinho
i hope he gets what he deserves. filthy child molestor. i cant believe anyone actually buys the crap he is selling (i guess i have to specify: by "crap" i mean lies, not records, although they both qualify)

/rant

-frang

ps - mjnews.us is garbage, the extreme opposite of tabloids, such biased, pro-michael jackson bullcrap if you ask me.

yeah!! evidence is so passe, trial by popular opinion!!!

its the wave of the future!

lol

hows thos the kid could perfectly describe michaels schlong. the night after he slept over at MJs place. coincidence? so disturbing. i understand that people may be fans of the music, but to deny that this guy is a twisted pervert is just pushing it.

 

[Alex]

yep guess this one is dead

 

[TommyVercetti]

Originally posted by: franguinho
i hope he gets what he deserves. filthy child molestor. i cant believe anyone actually buys the crap he is selling (i guess i have to specify: by "crap" i mean lies, not records, although they both qualify)

/rant

-frang

ps - mjnews.us is garbage, the extreme opposite of tabloids, such biased, pro-michael jackson bullcrap if you ask me.

Mjnews.us is his official website about this matter. Ofcourse it's going to be biased and pro-michael jackson.

 

[Alex]

Originally posted by: TommyVercetti

Originally posted by: franguinho
i hope he gets what he deserves. filthy child molestor. i cant believe anyone actually buys the crap he is selling (i guess i have to specify: by "crap" i mean lies, not records, although they both qualify)

/rant

-frang

ps - mjnews.us is garbage, the extreme opposite of tabloids, such biased, pro-michael jackson bullcrap if you ask me.

Mjnews.us is his official website about this matter. Ofcourse it's going to be biased and pro-michael jackson.

my point exactly

 

[Emveach]

Originally posted by: Ladies Man
Jackson is MOST DEFINITELY guilty.

He did it at least once and that is for sure.
Otherwise why would he have paid off the first kid for $14-40 million?

It was soooo bad the first time that immediately after that happened it went into law that had to go to trial and there were no out of court settlements on such charges.

If you knew the facts, then you would know that the first time he was accused it was only in a civil lawsuit. No charges were brought against him. Since all the family then wanted was money, settling out of court was just a quicker way of shutting everyone up, expecially since civil courts don't require proof beyond a resonable doubt.

Now that the law has been changed, children can be forced to testify, and now there are criminal charges filed. It makes these two incidents very different from one another.

 

[Alex]

Originally posted by: Emveach

Originally posted by: Ladies Man
Jackson is MOST DEFINITELY guilty.

He did it at least once and that is for sure.
Otherwise why would he have paid off the first kid for $14-40 million?

It was soooo bad the first time that immediately after that happened it went into law that had to go to trial and there were no out of court settlements on such charges.

If you knew the facts, then you would know that the first time he was accused it was only in a civil lawsuit. No charges were brought against him. Since all the family then wanted was money, settling out of court was just a quicker way of shutting everyone up, expecially since civil courts don't require proof beyond a resonable doubt.

Now that the law has been changed, children can be forced to testify, and now there are criminal charges filed. It makes these two incidents very different from one another.

but the one thing that doesnt change is the sheer horror of the attrocities he has inflicted upon that poor, unsuspecting infant

 

[Tetsuo]

Originally posted by: franguinho

Originally posted by: Emveach

Originally posted by: Ladies Man
Jackson is MOST DEFINITELY guilty.

He did it at least once and that is for sure.
Otherwise why would he have paid off the first kid for $14-40 million?

It was soooo bad the first time that immediately after that happened it went into law that had to go to trial and there were no out of court settlements on such charges.

If you knew the facts, then you would know that the first time he was accused it was only in a civil lawsuit. No charges were brought against him. Since all the family then wanted was money, settling out of court was just a quicker way of shutting everyone up, expecially since civil courts don't require proof beyond a resonable doubt.

Now that the law has been changed, children can be forced to testify, and now there are criminal charges filed. It makes these two incidents very different from one another.

but the one thing that doesnt change is the sheer horror of the attrocities he has inflicted upon that poor, unsuspecting infant

You do realize the person who is accusing him has already accused him before?

 

[GalvanizedYankee]

Santa Barbara does not want or need this kind of publicity. SBPD had to have something conclusive
to make the move they did, 70 officers, porta potties & hot food truck. So they could do it all in a day.
This is going to get real ugly in mid-December when what the SBPD has is reveled to the media.
Until then the accuser will be smeared by MJ's bought and paid for people.
His fans will cry their eyes out for awhile, then latch on to a new pop hero.

MJ's most likely going down, going down soft and weeping...................😉

 

[Emveach]

Originally posted by: franguinho

Originally posted by: Emveach

Originally posted by: Ladies Man
Jackson is MOST DEFINITELY guilty.

He did it at least once and that is for sure.
Otherwise why would he have paid off the first kid for $14-40 million?

It was soooo bad the first time that immediately after that happened it went into law that had to go to trial and there were no out of court settlements on such charges.

If you knew the facts, then you would know that the first time he was accused it was only in a civil lawsuit. No charges were brought against him. Since all the family then wanted was money, settling out of court was just a quicker way of shutting everyone up, expecially since civil courts don't require proof beyond a resonable doubt.

Now that the law has been changed, children can be forced to testify, and now there are criminal charges filed. It makes these two incidents very different from one another.

but the one thing that doesnt change is the sheer horror of the attrocities he has inflicted upon that poor, unsuspecting infant

Infant?? I don't think the child qualifies as an infant anymore.

Age aside, I prefer to make my judgment based upon facts and evidence. In my opinion, someone pointing a finger yelling "He did this to me" isn't facts. Show me evidence of wrong doing, then I'll make my mind up.