SagaLore
Elite Member
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
But organ transplants are a-okay... how's that for logic.
But only after they have blessed by a rabbi, soaked and preserved in salt.
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
But organ transplants are a-okay... how's that for logic.
Originally posted by: Psynaut
I was taught in sunday School that it is as hard for a rich man to get into heaven as it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. They taught this as though there were actually needle factories back then. Many years later I learned that the needle they referred to was an archway in the fence leading into the city and that camels had to kneel down to get through it. The asshats that taught me Sunday School, however, took it literally, to mean a modern day sewing needle. Christ Allmighty people are stupid!!!
Originally posted by: JDub02
I've never found that in the Bible. But if they want to refuse, that's OK.
Acts 15:29
that ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication. If ye keep yourselves from these things, ye shall do well. Fare ye well!"
Leviticus 17:10
And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn among you, who eateth any manner of blood, I will even set My face against that soul who eateth blood and will cut him off from among his people.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Psynaut
I was taught in sunday School that it is as hard for a rich man to get into heaven as it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. They taught this as though there were actually needle factories back then. Many years later I learned that the needle they referred to was an archway in the fence leading into the city and that camels had to kneel down to get through it. The asshats that taught me Sunday School, however, took it literally, to mean a modern day sewing needle. Christ Allmighty people are stupid!!!
so it wasn't really that hard to get in, just kind of time consuming?
also, they sewed stuff back then, didn't they? they must have had some kind of needle.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
But organ transplants are a-okay... how's that for logic.
But only after they have blessed by a rabbi, soaked and preserved in salt.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Psynaut
I was taught in sunday School that it is as hard for a rich man to get into heaven as it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. They taught this as though there were actually needle factories back then. Many years later I learned that the needle they referred to was an archway in the fence leading into the city and that camels had to kneel down to get through it. The asshats that taught me Sunday School, however, took it literally, to mean a modern day sewing needle. Christ Allmighty people are stupid!!!
so it wasn't really that hard to get in, just kind of time consuming?
also, they sewed stuff back then, didn't they? they must have had some kind of needle.
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Wow, that's pretty dumb.
Originally posted by: uhohs
Jesus explicitly tells his followers to share the Gospel with others.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
I was talking to a guy at work and he said he'd rather die than get a transfusion because the bible says not to.
interesting.
anyone else feel the same way?
Originally posted by: JohnCU
I was talking to a guy at work and he said he'd rather die than get a transfusion because the bible says not to.
interesting.
anyone else feel the same way?
Originally posted by: FDF12389
It doesn't say that in the bible.
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Originally posted by: uhohs
Jesus explicitly tells his followers to share the Gospel with others.
Didn't Jesus also tell his followers to kill anyone who wouldn't convert? Something like that. Maybe that was someone else. I don't know the Bible pretty well but I'm pretty sure there's at least one instance of someone telling everyone to massacre those that don't agree with you.
Furthermore, it's totally crazy that Jehovah's Witnesses have taken to heart that one specific "lesson" from Leviticus, which is by far the most fucked-up insane book of the Bible. Do they follow all the other lessons taught in Leviticus about when you have to stone people or burn them to death for various sins?
Originally posted by: IsLNdbOi
Originally posted by: JohnCU
I was talking to a guy at work and he said he'd rather die than get a transfusion because the bible says not to.
interesting.
anyone else feel the same way?
You believe him? 😕
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
It doesn't say anything of the sort in the Bible. Proof-texting is stupid anyways.
Plus, he sounds like a Jehovah's witness. I don't consider them to be Christian.
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: FDF12389
It doesn't say that in the bible.
The bible says anything the listener wants to hear. You can pull out any passage you like and give it the right spin to make your own personal idiocies words from on high. That's the whole freaking problem.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Psynaut
I was taught in sunday School that it is as hard for a rich man to get into heaven as it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. They taught this as though there were actually needle factories back then. Many years later I learned that the needle they referred to was an archway in the fence leading into the city and that camels had to kneel down to get through it. The asshats that taught me Sunday School, however, took it literally, to mean a modern day sewing needle. Christ Allmighty people are stupid!!!
so it wasn't really that hard to get in, just kind of time consuming?
also, they sewed stuff back then, didn't they? they must have had some kind of needle.
The camel not only had to kneel and crawl through, it also had to be unloaded of any burdens.
Thus understood, the metaphor becomes an interesting point about how it is often easier to unload a pack animal than it is for us to release our claims to earthly possessions and comforts. It shows a parallel (though not a complete one) to the Buddhist belief that attachment to worldly goods interferes with one's ability to obtain enlightenment.
ZV