Raduque
Lifer
- Aug 22, 2004
- 13,140
- 138
- 106
Shut the fuck up you fucking pathetic excuse for a man. If you don't like guns, don't click on the thread and go back to jerking off over trees and polar bears while taking it in the ass from your Apple loving boyfriend or whatever the fuck people like you do.
Check out recent chronograph testings of Double Tap ammo, you'll probably find their claimed speeds aren't measuring up to what people are getting.
Why settle for .45 ACP when you could just get 10mm. 1911 model guns are available in 10mm. The 10mm Glocks are the same size as the .45 Glocks.
Looking at 10mm, here's some chronograph date from drsjr1969's Youtube videos. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ak5OC6bPsjO8dEh6eGZ3N3hpUU13SXM5cm9pZy16T0E&hl=en#gid=0 You can see who loads hot ammo, and how far Double Tap is off their claimed mark. Underwood, Reed's, Elite, and Buffalo Bore have some of the hottest ammo.
Capacity difference between .40 and .45 is negligible, maybe 2 in a full size...and perceived recoil is more harsh with a .40, I've fired the exact same gun in each caliber and the .45 "felt" much easier to control, popular consensus is the .40 has much more muzzle flip and less control, now 9mm does give appreciably more capacity and control...IMHO
Because 10mm is freaking expensive. Even aluminum cased Blazer is 50 cents per round.
By comparison, I can get brass cased (I reload, so I use them) .45 for 33 cents a round.
So it's more about nostalgia. I can understand that, I have lots of friends who like black powder and archery.Plus the .45 has probably the most distinguished history of any handgun cartridge. If it's good enough for two World Wars, Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf, among many other conflicts, it's good enough to defend my home.![]()
Comparing single to double stack isn't exactly apples to apples thoughDepends on the gun but in most cases the .40 offer a significant increase in capacity.
Glock 22 .40 S&W 15+1
Sig P220 .45 ACP 8+1
Standard 1911 .45 ACP 8+1
Para 14-45 .45 ACP 14+1
.40 S&W definitely has a lot of felt recoil, especially in polymer guns where the frame absorbs less of it.
For fun I just looked up if it was legal to have a fore grip on a handgun and apparently it isn't*...apparently it falls under the NFA as the moment you attach a fore grip or stock it's deemed a SBR essentially since it's "intended to be used with 2 hands"The 93 kind of needs it
rofl :awe:Shut the fuck up you fucking pathetic excuse for a man. If you don't like guns, don't click on the thread and go back to jerking off over trees and polar bears while taking it in the ass from your Apple loving boyfriend or whatever the fuck people like you do.
For fun I just looked up if it was legal to have a fore grip on a handgun and apparently it isn't*...apparently it falls under the NFA as the moment you attach a fore grip or stock it's deemed a SBR essentially since it's "intended to be used with 2 hands"
*Well not legal without the appropriate tax stamps, forms, etc. if you don't live in a commie state
I knew that but was just curious if you could do it to any handgun for kicks...turns out that's a no unless you want to pay upBeretta 93Rs are 3 round burst capable and automatically NFA right there.
For fun I just looked up if it was legal to have a fore grip on a handgun and apparently it isn't*...apparently it falls under the NFA as the moment you attach a fore grip or stock it's deemed a SBR essentially since it's "intended to be used with 2 hands"
*Well not legal without the appropriate tax stamps, forms, etc. if you don't live in a commie state
They've restricted vertical fore grips. You can have a horizontal, even with some angle. People have been putting these on AR type pistols.
![]()
So it's more about nostalgia. I can understand that, I have lots of friends who like black powder and archery.
Capacity difference between .40 and .45 is negligible, maybe 2 in a full size...and perceived recoil is more harsh with a .40, I've fired the exact same gun in each caliber and the .45 "felt" much easier to control, popular consensus is the .40 has much more muzzle flip and less control, now 9mm does give appreciably more capacity and control...IMHO
Cool gun, I'm a secret Bond addict and given that the PPQ is based on the P99 I like it. If I lived in a country that allowed concealed carry and I felt the need then I'd own a PPK... Because I want to be bond![]()
I don't think that your Bond addiction is so secret.
Nice. I'd probably track down a P99AS for myself, I got spoiled with it being the first pistol I've fired. I like the extra trigger pull for that first round (if I want it). Field stripping either is also ridiculously easy compared to most other pistols.
A lot more than nostalgia add to the fact that the 1911 when properly made is one of the most reliable and accurate man stoppers.