- Nov 25, 2012
- 11,188
- 2,513
- 136
I had to watch it in my HS health education class. I'm not sure whether I watched all of it or not...but it seems I forgot practically everything but the the two "McDonald's lovers" and some of Spurlock's reactions. Being a teenager...I was persuaded emotionally, even though I didn't even eat at McDonald's at the time.
Some quick hitting thoughts that have came about on rewatching:
Some quick hitting thoughts that have came about on rewatching:
- If Spurlock vomited out one meal....then he didn't get the calories from the meal...
- In one part of the documentary, the video shows an obese woman using what looks like one of those shopping handicap carts, while narrating "walking has become such a chore, we even using machines to do it for us". Um, people only do that because they've become really sickened, not because it's a chore. I find it rather hypocritical because this could be interpreted as "fat people lacking in personal responsibility" despite the documentary running on the premise that "it's not personal responsibility, it's McDonald's faults". Also, those handicap carts are the result of law requiring reasonable accommodation for disability.
- In a similar vein, they seriously decided to feature Jared Fogle and Subway as some weight loss inspiration. Even without the later-revealed sexual predation Fogle engaged in, there is no way an alternative fast food restaurant is inherently better than 2004 McDonalds. Deli goop can be full of questionable chemicals too.
- They gave credence to the casomorphin myth regarding cheese by featuring vegan advocate Neal Barnard and his inaccurately named "Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine"
- His girlfriend in the film gave up veganism around 2013.
- Effective activism doesn't need to rely on solidly reasonable grounds. Rather, hitting the passions and causing negative publicity are of higher importance.
- Kelly Brownell can advocate for well-meaning policy solutions(that are out of touch or a slap on the wrist), but he's fat quite irl. Thus whatever diet he follows...is insufficient.
- Spurlock's "days" highlights are so short they might as well be meaningless.
- Sugar was named in association with other bad ingredients, a rare good thing from this doc, especially for the time.
- That a "Personal Responsibility" bill did come into existence that would have protected the likes of McDonalds from being sued is something noteworthy, along with the substantial House majority that voted for it.
- Despite apparently being inspired by a lawsuit by two minors against McDonald's and reading lines from that lawsuit, Spurlock delivers a line with an apparent negative connotation when introducing the case.