Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Either that, or you're such a hardcore conservative that you refuse to understand science and instead promote your conservative beliefs on the internet and probably blindly support Bush/Cheney.
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Either that, or you're such a hardcore conservative that you refuse to understand science and instead promote your conservative beliefs on the internet and probably blindly support Bush/Cheney.
Come on. Confess. The only reason for that thread was so you could talk about hardcore and Bush in the same sentence.
Thinking like you is like farting in a light bulb.Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Originally posted by: dug777
This thread rocks, i've got my esky full of beer, BBQ set-up, and a nice deckchair 😀
let the flaming begin! 😉
Originally posted by: DrPizza
I love that cartoon. If only the storkists could have found some missing link, or some little snippet of knowledge that we actually lack about reproduction, so they could have used that missing piece of knowledge as evidence that "reproductive theory" is wrong.
i.e. Scientists cannot explain how the embryo implants on the uterine wall, therefore the entire theory must be wrong.
Anyway, this should be fun to watch. 🙂
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
I can easily see evolution in everyday life.
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
The only reason that many people don't believe in evolution is due to their wacky religious beliefs. They are stupid and refuse to read the writing on the wall, that's all I can say about it. I mean, many of these fools believe that a ghost can get a person pregnant. How ridiculous is that?
fixedOriginally posted by: DainBramaged
Originally posted by: Drekce
That is a fundamentally flawed analogy. They are comparing something that we see everyday, a process that is fully understood and agreed upon scientifically to evolution. That comparison cannot be made in an honest manner.
I agree. His point might be made better if he used something more absurd than a stork