darkxshade
Lifer
- Mar 31, 2001
- 13,749
- 6
- 81
Would this neanderthal be able/allowed to reproduce? Because I'm absolutely sure there will be women that will want a piece of it. 
LOL. It's an 'update' to a volume that was published years ago. Theories and ideas have changed in light of new data, like the sequencing of the Neanderthal genome. Scientists are pretty notorious for revisioning...it's kinda integral to doing science!
I know, man. I work on the genetics side of evolution. In fact, the majority of what our lab does is whole genome, transcriptome, ChIP-seq...and now riboprofiling (I hope) sequencing.
wait, not one comment along the lines of How is Babby Formed?
OT has let me down.
![]()
At least we know how a Neanderthal babby is formed.
wait, not one comment along the lines of How is Babby Formed?
OT has let me down.
![]()
how about we clean out our own genepool before we start spilling over into one that had the good sense to go exstinct.
What do you mean by riboprofiling? Is this a ripseq sort of thing, or arrays....?
I didn't see it.NO, YOU HAVE LET OT DOWN!!!
caps
lol
sequencing (Illumina) at the resolution of translation stage. so, the little ~35mer mRNA fragments protected by ribosomes, that are actually being translated at x moment.
super cool.
there are currently 3 papers on it. my first attempt was, well...disaster.starting again next week
hm. Okay, without googling I'm going to guess - something like a triton lysis, precipitate ribosomes with an antibody or three, digest w/ rnase, then purify intact RNA, RT and sequence what's left?
crap, that sounds difficult as hell. Don't sneeze.![]()
I can't discuss or show the current protocol, as it is unpublished and I was specifically requested not to, but yeah most of that is about right.
This is one of the papers:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225288/
I can't discuss or show the current protocol, as it is unpublished and I was specifically requested not to, but yeah most of that is about right.
This is one of the papers:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225288/
If it is ever possible I would like to see a Neanderthal cloned and I would also like to know once and for all whether chimps and humans can interbreed. There are rumors just such a birth took place in the 20's at a university medical lab in the states and was quickly euthanize. I have no idea if that is just a bullshit rumor or true, but whether it is possible through normal means or only through genetic manipulation... I think these sorts of experiments would be very enlightening to humanity about the distinctions between species, would spread understanding of evolution, and advance science in general.
I would also like to see mammoths cloned, etc. I am very much pro-science.
--hilariously not possible.
--more or less possible.
--hilariously not possible..
chimps and humans can't interbreed, we're too distant genetically speaking.
This level of chromosomal similarity is roughly equivalent to that found in equines.
In a direct parallel to the chimp-human case, the Przewalski horse (Equus przewalskii) with 33 chromosome pairs, and the domestic horse (E. caballus) with 32 chromosome pairs, have been found to be interfertile, and produce semi-fertile offspring, where male hybrids can breed with female domestic horses.
So the question becomes, is it "hilariously not possible" or is it surrounded by so much taboo, fear, and too dangerous to things like religious ideas, etc... that the tests to confirm it's possibility or impossibility just simply aren't done. Or aren't known to the general public?
i'd be interested to know what the gestation period is for a neanderthal and what the average size of a neanderthal baby is when it's born. i mean, if the gestation period is like 11 months and the baby weights like 15 lbs, it would damn near kill a human surrogate.
It's not hilariously not possible. It is entirely plausible. But it is absolutely taboo and monstrously unethical to test, so we'll never know. (Hopefully.)
Same as living humans for both gestation length and birth size.
how do the know? have they found fossils with babies inside the womb and outside of the womb and made an educated guess based on bone formation rates in humans?
It's not hilariously not possible. It is entirely plausible. But it is absolutely taboo and monstrously unethical to test, so we'll never know. (Hopefully.)