• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I Am Spartacus

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You just made that up, but it is cute. If someone is throwing the "whore" label around i'd rather see it applied to someone like Harris/Brown that it really fits.
I don't condone of calling any woman a whore. Why are you such a hypocrite that you think it's ok just because "the other side" did it? Oh wait, that's because you don't think. Because if you did, you'd understand what I meant by petty, uncivil, and childish behavior. FFS, my 5 year old already knows that 2 wrongs don't make right. Why don't you?
 
You just made that up, but it is cute. If someone is throwing the "whore" label around i'd rather see it applied to someone like Harris/Brown that it really fits.
Geez man are you fucking blind and dumb? Vic's description is exactly Trump and what he is doing. Time and time again he has publicly opined about the justice department working for him and demanding loyalty oaths. If Trump isn't petty, uncivil and childish then who is?
 
Bruh if you think it was at all anything other than political theatre as a kickoff for a 2020 run you might as well be wearing a MAGA hat.
So what was up with the douchebag Republican reading the Senate rules off? Was he in on it? Another Democrat plant?

Booker was illustrating that they are keeping a ton of information undercover for no good reason.
 
I am disappointed nobody followed my lead
giphy.gif
 
So what was up with the douchebag Republican reading the Senate rules off? Was he in on it? Another Democrat plant?

Booker was illustrating that they are keeping a ton of information undercover for no good reason.


I’m not defending the pubs, everything should be open. Bookers look at me moment was nothing more than a look at me moment though. Telling the wsj reporter he was violating the constitution was very Trumpy too. Come 2020 we may have two attention whores running against each other. 😱
 
She’s concern trolling...? At this point I’m doubting y’all even understand what you’re saying, "concern" is just he default response to everything. If makes conversations honestly pretty one sided and boring. It’s become a crutch, something you guys hide behind. Try actually responding every now and just to try it on for size, see how it feels. You may end up liking it :beermug:

No one said she's concern trolling. He said she's trolling.

Concern trolling is a specific way to troll, which again no one except you brought up.

If you need help with anything else let me know.
 
I don't condone of calling any woman a whore. Why are you such a hypocrite that you think it's ok just because "the other side" did it? Oh wait, that's because you don't think. Because if you did, you'd understand what I meant by petty, uncivil, and childish behavior. FFS, my 5 year old already knows that 2 wrongs don't make right. Why don't you?
I didn't call her an attention whore because she is a woman, Trump is the biggest attention whore in the country and I don't believe he's a woman.
 
I don't condone of calling any woman a whore. Why are you such a hypocrite that you think it's ok just because "the other side" did it? Oh wait, that's because you don't think. Because if you did, you'd understand what I meant by petty, uncivil, and childish behavior. FFS, my 5 year old already knows that 2 wrongs don't make right. Why don't you?

Then may I ask, why you are calling him out for it when he was not the one who started calling a woman a whore in this thread? If you are going to say he is wrong for holding a double standard, then it would seem hypocritical of you not to call out the person that started it.

Perhaps you missed it?
 
I didn't call her an attention whore because she is a woman, Trump is the biggest attention whore in the country and I don't believe he's a woman.

That is invalid apparently. If you say something that could be taken as racist, sexist, ect, then it is. Your intent does not matter as you are clearly showing signs of internal unknown bias. Your labeling of a woman in a derogatory feminine way is inherently sexist. Saying that you are not sexist is no proof and should be dismissed.
 
No one said she's concern trolling. He said she's trolling.

Concern trolling is a specific way to troll, which again no one except you brought up.

If you need help with anything else let me know.


He edited it out of his post.

edit: hmm i'm questioning myself now, something happened
 
Then may I ask, why you are calling him out for it when he was not the one who started calling a woman a whore in this thread? If you are going to say he is wrong for holding a double standard, then it would seem hypocritical of you not to call out the person that started it.

Perhaps you missed it?

Some of my conversation with Taj was carried over from another thread. From what I can see, Taj's only arguments seem to be variations on the theme that he and conservatives can do whatever they want because liberals did everything bad first.
 
Some of my conversation with Taj was carried over from another thread. From what I can see, Taj's only arguments seem to be variations on the theme that he and conservatives can do whatever they want because liberals did everything bad first.

Well, to catch you up, it was a Left person that called the woman a whore. Calling out Taj is fine as he seems dumb, but, the whole whore thing started from someone else in this thread which appears to be what he was referring to.
 
Back
Top