- Mar 15, 2003
- 12,668
- 103
- 106
They both started off with sub-par products, managed to get some success based purely on being a great value, and are now making products that garner the respect of the automotive press. Thoughts?
Originally posted by: Eghck
what about mazda?
Originally posted by: Eghck
what about mazda?
Originally posted by: Eghck
what is hyundai's model lineup. I've never driven one and the only two I know are the sonata and the xg300?
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
Well, I feel that pre-Athlon 64 AMD had some SERIOUS reliability issues. Athlon 64 changed AMD, the XP lead to this change but they're a very different company based on one product line. The new Sonata, I see, as that one product. All reports about Hyundai from the past 2 years or so is that the reliability has gone up to represent the norm of the industry.
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
What unique features does Hyundai offer?
Originally posted by: Remy XO
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
What unique features does Hyundai offer?
bang for the buck?
Originally posted by: tweakmm
I disagree.
I would not be ashamed to have an AMD processor in my computer.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Remy XO
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
What unique features does Hyundai offer?
bang for the buck?
Like what?
Originally posted by: Scouzer
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
Well, I feel that pre-Athlon 64 AMD had some SERIOUS reliability issues. Athlon 64 changed AMD, the XP lead to this change but they're a very different company based on one product line. The new Sonata, I see, as that one product. All reports about Hyundai from the past 2 years or so is that the reliability has gone up to represent the norm of the industry.
What serious issues did pre A64's have? I'm on my 2500+ Barton right now...no issues...
My prior computer was a 1.4ghz T-Bird...no issues there either!
The new Sonata is extremely nice though. I think other than the Sonata the whole lineup needs another generation, then we'll see about it being AMD![]()
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I disagree. When AMD started gathering steam it had no significant drawbacks--unlike its former stability problems and relative lack of speed to Intel.
Hyundai on the other hand has the brute power (features) but still has questionable reliability and build standards.
It is definitely on its way to being how we feel about AMD, but its not there yet, IMO.
Getting there is not there.Originally posted by: Scouzer
Originally posted by: tweakmm
I disagree.
I would not be ashamed to have an AMD processor in my computer.
But you would 10 years ago...
hence my argument Hyundai is getting there