• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Hybrid airship launched.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
oh :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

airlander-10-kardashian.jpg

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...canny-resemblance-to-Kim-Kardashians-bum.html


You win OT for the day.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
That's probably the future since helium is, supposedly, really expensive. Seriously, vacuum lighter than helium so you'd technically need even less displacement, but you'd need a frame to contain the vacuum so that makes it heavier.
Good luck making something lightweight and large that can hold a vacuum without collapsing on itself.
A really perfect sphere...carbon fiber......graphene....and so on. No problem. Easy.
:sneaky:


...well, I was going to say that helium supplies are on-track to run out at some point, but upon checking Wiki for the specifics of helium's regeneration rate through natural radioactive decay, I saw this:
Previously, terrestrial helium was thought to be a non-renewable resource because once released into the atmosphere, it readily escapes into space. However, recent studies suggest that helium is produced deep in the earth by radioactive decay, and that large untapped reserves may exist under the Rocky Mountains in North America and in natural gas reserves.
Huh, interesting. I knew about the radioactive decay thing already, but had thought that the rate was low compared to our rate of consumption.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Why don't they just make vacuum airships? Lighter than even helium and it doesn't use up as many resources.

Because they can't. As far as I'm aware, at this point, we don't have any materials such an airship could be made out of. Any vacuum "airship" strong enough to maintain the vacuum without collapsing or buckling (then collapsing) would weigh too much to be buoyant in the first place. E.g. go to youtube and look for videos that demonstrate how much air pressure there is around us, such as cans being crushed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJVHtF8GwI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvm00Uiy_UU

Just think - you've finally succeeded - you've done it! It floats! A bird bumps into you. Booooom. You instantly turn into tons of material with virtually zero buoyancy. You've almost literally gone from flying something to flying a brick. Except, unlike that analogy to the STS that it's "like flying a brick" - it really would be like flying a brick - bricks don't fly... at all.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
All hail the 'Flying Bum'
Upper management walks by an engineer's computer as he's got something suspicious on the screen.


"Oh, um, it's....it's a new....aircraft design I'm working on. Now. At my computer. Designing."
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Because they can't. As far as I'm aware, at this point, we don't have any materials such an airship could be made out of. Any vacuum "airship" strong enough to maintain the vacuum without collapsing or buckling (then collapsing) would weigh too much to be buoyant in the first place. E.g. go to youtube and look for videos that demonstrate how much air pressure there is around us, such as cans being crushed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJVHtF8GwI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvm00Uiy_UU

Just think - you've finally succeeded - you've done it! It floats! A bird bumps into you. Booooom. You instantly turn into tons of material with virtually zero buoyancy. You've almost literally gone from flying something to flying a brick. Except, unlike that analogy to the STS that it's "like flying a brick" - it really would be like flying a brick - bricks don't fly... at all.

Hey, that second video is from Toledo! Neat.
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,483
2,418
136
Update: 2nd test flight
The World's Longest Airship Just Crash-Landed After England Test Flight
The world’s longest aircraft, the Airlander 10 airship, has crash-landed after a test flight in Bedfordshire, central England, its British manufacturer Hybrid Air Vehicles said on Wednesday.
The airship, which is bigger than the size of six double-decker buses, sustained damage on landing from its second test flight, Hybrid Air Vehicles said, adding that all crew were safe and well following the incident.
The 92-meter Airlander 10 made its first test flight earlier this month and the company had posted photographs of it up in the air before Wednesday’s incident.
 

FeuerFrei

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2005
9,144
929
126
Ideally, it should be designed to collide with other airships without sustaining damage. Imagine the fun! Bumper cars of the sky.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
Are you talking about the impending helium shortage?

At 100 mph and 200 tons its really a question of is it cheaper than jet or truck? Also, at 100 mph is there cargo that benefits from the decreased time over trucks and can the cargo go slower than on a jet.

btw how much can a semi carry?

A semi can carry 80,000lbs max. so the airship could carry 5 times that amount. Also, you have to consider that roads are not straight so travel over ground will be a longer distance traveled than by air. Not to mention traffic, stop lights etc.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
Note to self: if I must be in an aircraft crash, I want to be on that aircraft.

How do I thumbs-up emoji the shit out of this?

Seriously, I will gladly sacrifice a month to make it to some other place if it's on that thing.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,022
136
Pull up! Pull up! ... 10 minutes later ... Pull up! Pull up! Oh never mind! *starts blowing hot air into the balloon*