I heard the death toll has reached 50+ on the news.
Why is site management not forcing the OP to change the thread title?
Guess it depends the definition of event, scale and perspective.
Event defined as "a storm of unprecedented power" - no. Even considering it became an hybrid system by merging with the cold front, there are records of higher category hurricanes hitting the east coast.
From the point of view of causing life loss and damage, certainly.
It has also shown deficiencies on the ability for the regions affected to withstand storms.
Consider the title a scarlet letter of sorts for the OP.![]()
Yeah, but your typical hurricane has actual hurricane force winds over a very small diameter, like 20-30 miles, and passes through quickly. Sandy technically hit 200 miles southwest of me, and there were still hurricane force winds that lasted for hours and hours. I've never heard of a hurricane before where they told everyone to forget where the eye is, cause the whole region is going to get blasted. Jersey got absolutely soaked, Long Island got winds like I've never seen before.
So many broken windows!
Krugman will have good things to say about this storm and its effect on the economy. Disaster recovery and construction will be in a huge boom to rebuild.
We need storms like this more often to spur the economy.
You can say it's not right, but that would be denying the reality of what typically happens after a huge storm like this.
Edit: We have enough denial of reality already on this site.
Water evaporates, nonevent.
Up to 80 lives lost including 2 children that were torn out of their mothers arms on Staten Island from this "non event" as called by P&Ners.
They found the bodies today.
And twice that number have committed suicide today for unrelated reasons.
Statistically, 50 is an insignificant number. Any severe storm will have a number of deaths associated with it.